It looks like this structure isn't being used at all. So I'm OK with
this change, in case we ever use it in the future.
Regards,
Felix
Am 2022-02-18 um 02:47 schrieb Christian König:
Felix need to comment as well, but I don't think that this will work
that easily.
By changing the entry from 1 to 0 your are also changing the size of
the structure.
Regards,
Christian.
Am 18.02.22 um 04:09 schrieb cgel.zte@xxxxxxxxx:
From: Changcheng Deng <deng.changcheng@xxxxxxxxxx>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
should always use "flexible array members" for these cases. The older
style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used.
Reference:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays
Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Changcheng Deng <deng.changcheng@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_crat.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_crat.h
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_crat.h
index 482ba84a728d..d7c38fbc533e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_crat.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_crat.h
@@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ struct cdit_header {
uint32_t creator_revision;
uint32_t total_entries;
uint16_t num_domains;
- uint8_t entry[1];
+ uint8_t entry[];
};
#pragma pack()
