Am 15.02.22 um 00:21 schrieb Luben Tuikov:
Add the "harvest" field to the IP attributes in
the IP discovery sysfs visualization, as this
field is present in the binary data.
Cc: Alex Deucher <Alexander.Deucher@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Luben Tuikov <luben.tuikov@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_discovery.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_discovery.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_discovery.c
index c8dbdb78988ce0..0496d369504641 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_discovery.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_discovery.c
@@ -393,6 +393,7 @@ struct ip_hw_instance {
int hw_id;
u8 num_instance;
u8 major, minor, revision;
+ u8 harvest;
Should we maybe use bool here instead?
Apart from that looks good to me.
Regards,
Christian.
int num_base_addresses;
u32 base_addr[];
@@ -440,6 +441,11 @@ static ssize_t revision_show(struct ip_hw_instance *ip_hw_instance, char *buf)
return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", ip_hw_instance->revision);
}
+static ssize_t harvest_show(struct ip_hw_instance *ip_hw_instance, char *buf)
+{
+ return sysfs_emit(buf, "0x%01X\n", ip_hw_instance->harvest);
+}
+
static ssize_t num_base_addresses_show(struct ip_hw_instance *ip_hw_instance, char *buf)
{
return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", ip_hw_instance->num_base_addresses);
@@ -471,6 +477,7 @@ static struct ip_hw_instance_attr ip_hw_attr[] = {
__ATTR_RO(major),
__ATTR_RO(minor),
__ATTR_RO(revision),
+ __ATTR_RO(harvest),
__ATTR_RO(num_base_addresses),
__ATTR_RO(base_addr),
};
@@ -708,6 +715,7 @@ static int amdgpu_discovery_sysfs_ips(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
ip_hw_instance->major = ip->major;
ip_hw_instance->minor = ip->minor;
ip_hw_instance->revision = ip->revision;
+ ip_hw_instance->harvest = ip->harvest;
ip_hw_instance->num_base_addresses = ip->num_base_address;
for (kk = 0; kk < ip_hw_instance->num_base_addresses; kk++)
base-commit: d8604f1d237a145db48bae4ea60b85a5875df307
