Am 15.02.22 um 02:59 schrieb Qing Wang:
From: Wang Qing <wangqing@xxxxxxxx>
adev should be assigned after a null check
I would rather remove the NULL check altogether.
The caller is supposed to make sure that the context is valid and even
if it isn't that's not a recoverable error here.
Regards,
Christian.
Signed-off-by: Wang Qing <wangqing@xxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ctx.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ctx.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ctx.c
index 2c929fa..da114f7
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ctx.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ctx.c
@@ -259,12 +259,13 @@ static void amdgpu_ctx_fini_entity(struct amdgpu_ctx_entity *entity)
static int amdgpu_ctx_get_stable_pstate(struct amdgpu_ctx *ctx,
u32 *stable_pstate)
{
- struct amdgpu_device *adev = ctx->adev;
+ struct amdgpu_device *adev;
enum amd_dpm_forced_level current_level;
if (!ctx)
return -EINVAL;
+ adev = ctx->adev;
current_level = amdgpu_dpm_get_performance_level(adev);
switch (current_level) {
@@ -290,13 +291,14 @@ static int amdgpu_ctx_get_stable_pstate(struct amdgpu_ctx *ctx,
static int amdgpu_ctx_set_stable_pstate(struct amdgpu_ctx *ctx,
u32 stable_pstate)
{
- struct amdgpu_device *adev = ctx->adev;
+ struct amdgpu_device *adev;
enum amd_dpm_forced_level level;
int r;
if (!ctx)
return -EINVAL;
+ adev = ctx->adev;
mutex_lock(&adev->pm.stable_pstate_ctx_lock);
if (adev->pm.stable_pstate_ctx && adev->pm.stable_pstate_ctx != ctx) {
r = -EBUSY;