I think so, Alex will probably pick that up.
Thanks,
Christian.
Am 08.02.22 um 09:28 schrieb zhanglianjie:
I am very sorry that I submitted many times due to the character
coding problem. Can PATCH V4 be used?
I'm scratching my head what you are doing here?
That's the fives time you send out the same patch, so something is
going wrong here :)
Please double check why that lands in your outbox over and over again.
Regards,
Christian.
Am 08.02.22 um 09:14 schrieb zhanglianjie:
after the buffer object is successfully mapped, call
radeon_bo_kunmap before the function returns.
Signed-off-by: zhanglianjie <zhanglianjie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c
index 377f9cdb5b53..0558d928d98d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c
@@ -497,6 +497,7 @@ static int radeon_uvd_cs_msg(struct
radeon_cs_parser *p, struct radeon_bo *bo,
handle = msg[2];
if (handle == 0) {
+ radeon_bo_kunmap(bo);
DRM_ERROR("Invalid UVD handle!\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -559,12 +560,10 @@ static int radeon_uvd_cs_msg(struct
radeon_cs_parser *p, struct radeon_bo *bo,
return 0;
default:
-
DRM_ERROR("Illegal UVD message type (%d)!\n", msg_type);
- return -EINVAL;
}
- BUG();
+ radeon_bo_kunmap(bo);
return -EINVAL;
}
--
2.20.1
