Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] lib/string_helpers: Consolidate yesno() implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 10:06:35AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 11:18:59 +0200
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 11:24:48PM -0800, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> @@ -1354,8 +1345,7 @@ static bool tomoyo_print_condition(struct tomoyo_io_buffer *head,
>  	case 3:
>  		if (cond->grant_log != TOMOYO_GRANTLOG_AUTO)
>  			tomoyo_io_printf(head, " grant_log=%s",
> -					 tomoyo_yesno(cond->grant_log ==
> -						      TOMOYO_GRANTLOG_YES));
> +					 yesno(cond->grant_log == TOMOYO_GRANTLOG_YES));

This would be better split on two lines.

Really? Yuck!

I thought the "max line size" guideline was going to grow to a 100, but I
still see it as 80. But anyway...

Checking that: docs still say 80, but checkpatch was changed to warn
only on 100. Commit bdc48fa11e46 ("checkpatch/coding-style: deprecate
80-column warning") is clear why the discrepancy.

Lucas De Marchi


	cond->grant_log ==
	TOMOYO_GRANTLOG_YES

is not readable at all. Not compared to

	cond->grant_log == TOMOYO_GRANTLOG_YES

I say keep it one line!

Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>

-- Steve


Then,

Reviewed-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux