Am 2021-12-16 um 4:45 a.m. schrieb Lukas Bulwahn:
> Commit b5f57384805a ("drm/amdkfd: Add sysfs bitfields and enums to uAPI")
> adds include/uapi/linux/kfd_sysfs.h with the "GPL-2.0 OR MIT WITH
> Linux-syscall-note" SPDX-License expression.
>
> The command ./scripts/spdxcheck.py warns:
>
> include/uapi/linux/kfd_sysfs.h: 1:48 Exception not valid for license MIT: Linux-syscall-note
>
> For a uapi header, the file under GPLv2 License must be combined with the
> Linux-syscall-note, but combining the MIT License with the
> Linux-syscall-note makes no sense, as the note provides an exception for
> GPL-licensed code, not for permissively licensed code.
>
> So, reorganize the SPDX expression to only combine the note with the GPL
> License condition. This makes spdxcheck happy again.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> I am not a lawyer and I do not intend to modify the actual licensing of
> this header file. So, I really would like to have an Ack from some AMD
> developer here.
>
> Maybe also a lawyer on the linux-spdx list can check my reasoning on the
> licensing with the exception note?
>
> include/uapi/linux/kfd_sysfs.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kfd_sysfs.h b/include/uapi/linux/kfd_sysfs.h
> index e1fb78b4bf09..3e330f368917 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/kfd_sysfs.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/kfd_sysfs.h
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 OR MIT WITH Linux-syscall-note */
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT */
> /*
> * Copyright 2021 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
> *
