On 12/8/2021 2:43 PM, Chen, Guchun wrote:
[Public]
Hi Leslie,
Can we move revision handling in this patch into amdgpu_discovery_get_vcn_version? Then we will maintain all revision handlings only in amdgpu_discovery.c.
This seems to be more about VCN config than revision. A better thing to
do will be to rename sriov_config as vcn_config and use that here
(regardless of SRIOV or not).
Change discovery code to -
adev->vcn.vcn_config[adev->vcn.num_vcn_inst] = (ip->revision & 0xc0);
And check here as:
vcn_config & VCN_BLOCK_ENCODE_DISABLE_MASK
Looks like baremetal enables all and VF enables only encode or decode on
particular VCN instance.
Thanks,
Lijo
Regards,
Guchun
-----Original Message-----
From: amd-gfx <amd-gfx-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Leslie Shi
Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 4:46 PM
To: amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: fix incorrect VCN revision in SRIOV
Guest OS will setup VCN instance 1 which is disabled as an enabled instance.
This will cause VCN ib ring test failure during modprobe.
Fixes: 36b7d5646476 ("drm/amdgpu: handle SRIOV VCN revision parsing")
Signed-off-by: Leslie Shi <Yuliang.Shi@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vcn.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vcn.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vcn.c
index 2658414c503d..2323815ac32d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vcn.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vcn.c
@@ -293,6 +293,9 @@ bool amdgpu_vcn_is_disabled_vcn(struct amdgpu_device *adev, enum vcn_ring_type t
if (amdgpu_discovery_get_vcn_version(adev, vcn_instance, &major, &minor, &revision) != 0)
return true;
+ if (amdgpu_sriov_vf(adev))
+ revision |= adev->vcn.sriov_config[vcn_instance] << 6;
+
if ((type == VCN_ENCODE_RING) && (revision & VCN_BLOCK_ENCODE_DISABLE_MASK)) {
ret = true;
} else if ((type == VCN_DECODE_RING) && (revision & VCN_BLOCK_DECODE_DISABLE_MASK)) {