Thanks for the review , change the description as suggested and submitted.
Shaoyun.liu
-----Original Message-----
From: Kuehling, Felix <Felix.Kuehling@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2021 1:19 AM
To: amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Liu, Shaoyun <Shaoyun.Liu@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: adjust the kfd reset sequence in reset sriov function
Am 2021-11-29 um 9:40 p.m. schrieb shaoyunl:
> This change revert previous commit
> 7079e7d5c6bf: drm/amd/amdgpu: fix the kfd pre_reset sequence in sriov
> cd547b93c62a: drm/amdgpu: move kfd post_reset out of reset_sriov
> function
It looks like this is not a straight revert. It moves the amdgpu_amdkfd_pre_reset to an earlier place in amdgpu_device_reset_sriov, presumably to address the sequence issue that the first patch was originally meant to fix. The patch description should mention that.
With that fixed, the patch is
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@xxxxxxx>
>
> Some register access(GRBM_GFX_CNTL) only be allowed on full access
> mode. Move kfd_pre_reset and kfd_post_reset back inside reset_sriov
> function.
>
> Signed-off-by: shaoyunl <shaoyun.liu@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 12 ++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> index 1989f9e9379e..3c5afa45173c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> @@ -4285,6 +4285,8 @@ static int amdgpu_device_reset_sriov(struct
> amdgpu_device *adev, {
> int r;
>
> + amdgpu_amdkfd_pre_reset(adev);
> +
> if (from_hypervisor)
> r = amdgpu_virt_request_full_gpu(adev, true);
> else
> @@ -4312,6 +4314,7 @@ static int amdgpu_device_reset_sriov(struct
> amdgpu_device *adev,
>
> amdgpu_irq_gpu_reset_resume_helper(adev);
> r = amdgpu_ib_ring_tests(adev);
> + amdgpu_amdkfd_post_reset(adev);
>
> error:
> if (!r && adev->virt.gim_feature & AMDGIM_FEATURE_GIM_FLR_VRAMLOST)
> { @@ -5026,7 +5029,8 @@ int amdgpu_device_gpu_recover(struct
> amdgpu_device *adev,
>
> cancel_delayed_work_sync(&tmp_adev->delayed_init_work);
>
> - amdgpu_amdkfd_pre_reset(tmp_adev);
> + if (!amdgpu_sriov_vf(tmp_adev))
> + amdgpu_amdkfd_pre_reset(tmp_adev);
>
> /*
> * Mark these ASICs to be reseted as untracked first @@ -5144,9
> +5148,9 @@ int amdgpu_device_gpu_recover(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>
> skip_sched_resume:
> list_for_each_entry(tmp_adev, device_list_handle, reset_list) {
> - /* unlock kfd */
> - if (!need_emergency_restart)
> - amdgpu_amdkfd_post_reset(tmp_adev);
> + /* unlock kfd: SRIOV would do it separately */
> + if (!need_emergency_restart && !amdgpu_sriov_vf(tmp_adev))
> + amdgpu_amdkfd_post_reset(tmp_adev);
>
> /* kfd_post_reset will do nothing if kfd device is not initialized,
> * need to bring up kfd here if it's not be initialized before
