On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 4:25 PM Leo Li <sunpeng.li@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2021-08-16 9:59 a.m., Leo Li wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2021-08-13 3:21 p.m., Liu, Zhan wrote:
> >> [AMD Official Use Only]
> >>
> >> [AMD Official Use Only]
> >>
> >> [why]
> >> dcn301_calculate_wm_and_dl() causes flickering when external monitor is
> >> connected.
> >>
> >> This issue has been fixed before by commit 0e4c0ae59d7e
> >> ("drm/amdgpu/display: drop dcn301_calculate_wm_and_dl for now"), however
> >> part of the fix was gone after commit 2cbcb78c9ee5 ("Merge tag
> >> 'amd-drm-next-5.13-2021-03-23' of
> >> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgitlab.freedesktop.org%2Fagd5f%2Flinux&data=04%7C01%7Csunpeng.li%40amd.com%7C723f9131e57b4bd99db508d960be2441%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637647192045690562%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=f2gL9TVAvdXlCbsZCDa2prF1J4l2ZDbpY8L2f6vK7as%3D&reserved=0
> >> into drm-next").
> >>
> >> [how]
> >> Use dcn30_calculate_wm_and_dlg() instead as in the original fix.
> >>
> >> Fixes: 2cbcb78c9ee5 ("Merge tag 'amd-drm-next-5.13-2021-03-23' of
> >> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgitlab.freedesktop.org%2Fagd5f%2Flinux&data=04%7C01%7Csunpeng.li%40amd.com%7C723f9131e57b4bd99db508d960be2441%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637647192045690562%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=f2gL9TVAvdXlCbsZCDa2prF1J4l2ZDbpY8L2f6vK7as%3D&reserved=0
> >> into drm-next")
> >> Signed-off-by: Nikola Cornij mailto:nikola.cornij@xxxxxxx
> >> ---
> >> .../amd/display/dc/dcn301/dcn301_resource.c | 96 +------------------
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 95 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn301/dcn301_resource.c
> >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn301/dcn301_resource.c
> >> index 9776d1737818..912285fdce18 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn301/dcn301_resource.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn301/dcn301_resource.c
> >> @@ -1622,106 +1622,12 @@ static void
> >> dcn301_update_bw_bounding_box(struct dc *dc, struct clk_bw_params *b
> >> dml_init_instance(&dc->dml, &dcn3_01_soc, &dcn3_01_ip,
> >> DML_PROJECT_DCN30);
> >> }
> >>
> >> -static void calculate_wm_set_for_vlevel(
> >> - int vlevel,
> >> - struct wm_range_table_entry *table_entry,
> >> - struct dcn_watermarks *wm_set,
> >> - struct display_mode_lib *dml,
> >> - display_e2e_pipe_params_st *pipes,
> >> - int pipe_cnt)
> >> -{
> >> - double dram_clock_change_latency_cached =
> >> dml->soc.dram_clock_change_latency_us;
> >> -
> >> - ASSERT(vlevel < dml->soc.num_states);
> >> - /* only pipe 0 is read for voltage and dcf/soc clocks */
> >> - pipes[0].clks_cfg.voltage = vlevel;
> >> - pipes[0].clks_cfg.dcfclk_mhz =
> >> dml->soc.clock_limits[vlevel].dcfclk_mhz;
> >> - pipes[0].clks_cfg.socclk_mhz =
> >> dml->soc.clock_limits[vlevel].socclk_mhz;
> >> -
> >> - dml->soc.dram_clock_change_latency_us =
> >> table_entry->pstate_latency_us;
> >> - dml->soc.sr_exit_time_us = table_entry->sr_exit_time_us;
> >> - dml->soc.sr_enter_plus_exit_time_us =
> >> table_entry->sr_enter_plus_exit_time_us;
> >> -
> >> - wm_set->urgent_ns = get_wm_urgent(dml, pipes, pipe_cnt) * 1000;
> >> - wm_set->cstate_pstate.cstate_enter_plus_exit_ns =
> >> get_wm_stutter_enter_exit(dml, pipes, pipe_cnt) * 1000;
> >> - wm_set->cstate_pstate.cstate_exit_ns =
> >> get_wm_stutter_exit(dml, pipes, pipe_cnt) * 1000;
> >> - wm_set->cstate_pstate.pstate_change_ns =
> >> get_wm_dram_clock_change(dml, pipes, pipe_cnt) * 1000;
> >> - wm_set->pte_meta_urgent_ns = get_wm_memory_trip(dml, pipes,
> >> pipe_cnt) * 1000;
> >> - wm_set->frac_urg_bw_nom =
> >> get_fraction_of_urgent_bandwidth(dml, pipes, pipe_cnt) * 1000;
> >> - wm_set->frac_urg_bw_flip =
> >> get_fraction_of_urgent_bandwidth_imm_flip(dml, pipes, pipe_cnt) * 1000;
> >> - wm_set->urgent_latency_ns = get_urgent_latency(dml, pipes,
> >> pipe_cnt) * 1000;
> >> - dml->soc.dram_clock_change_latency_us =
> >> dram_clock_change_latency_cached;
> >> -
> >> -}
> >> -
> >> -static void dcn301_calculate_wm_and_dlg(
> >> - struct dc *dc, struct dc_state *context,
> >> - display_e2e_pipe_params_st *pipes,
> >> - int pipe_cnt,
> >> - int vlevel_req)
> >> -{
> >> - int i, pipe_idx;
> >> - int vlevel, vlevel_max;
> >> - struct wm_range_table_entry *table_entry;
> >> - struct clk_bw_params *bw_params = dc->clk_mgr->bw_params;
> >> -
> >> - ASSERT(bw_params);
> >> -
> >> - vlevel_max = bw_params->clk_table.num_entries - 1;
> >> -
> >> - /* WM Set D */
> >> - table_entry = &bw_params->wm_table.entries[WM_D];
> >> - if (table_entry->wm_type == WM_TYPE_RETRAINING)
> >> - vlevel = 0;
> >> - else
> >> - vlevel = vlevel_max;
> >> - calculate_wm_set_for_vlevel(vlevel, table_entry,
> >> &context->bw_ctx.bw.dcn.watermarks.d,
> >> - &context->bw_ctx.dml,
> >> pipes, pipe_cnt);
> >> - /* WM Set C */
> >> - table_entry = &bw_params->wm_table.entries[WM_C];
> >> - vlevel = min(max(vlevel_req, 2), vlevel_max);
> >> - calculate_wm_set_for_vlevel(vlevel, table_entry,
> >> &context->bw_ctx.bw.dcn.watermarks.c,
> >> - &context->bw_ctx.dml,
> >> pipes, pipe_cnt);
> >> - /* WM Set B */
> >> - table_entry = &bw_params->wm_table.entries[WM_B];
> >> - vlevel = min(max(vlevel_req, 1), vlevel_max);
> >> - calculate_wm_set_for_vlevel(vlevel, table_entry,
> >> &context->bw_ctx.bw.dcn.watermarks.b,
> >> - &context->bw_ctx.dml,
> >> pipes, pipe_cnt);
> >> -
> >> - /* WM Set A */
> >> - table_entry = &bw_params->wm_table.entries[WM_A];
> >> - vlevel = min(vlevel_req, vlevel_max);
> >> - calculate_wm_set_for_vlevel(vlevel, table_entry,
> >> &context->bw_ctx.bw.dcn.watermarks.a,
> >> - &context->bw_ctx.dml,
> >> pipes, pipe_cnt);
> >> -
> >> - for (i = 0, pipe_idx = 0; i < dc->res_pool->pipe_count; i++) {
> >> - if (!context->res_ctx.pipe_ctx[i].stream)
> >> - continue;
> >> -
> >> - pipes[pipe_idx].clks_cfg.dispclk_mhz =
> >> get_dispclk_calculated(&context->bw_ctx.dml, pipes, pipe_cnt);
> >> - pipes[pipe_idx].clks_cfg.dppclk_mhz =
> >> get_dppclk_calculated(&context->bw_ctx.dml, pipes, pipe_cnt, pipe_idx);
> >> -
> >> - if (dc->config.forced_clocks) {
> >> - pipes[pipe_idx].clks_cfg.dispclk_mhz =
> >> context->bw_ctx.dml.soc.clock_limits[0].dispclk_mhz;
> >> - pipes[pipe_idx].clks_cfg.dppclk_mhz =
> >> context->bw_ctx.dml.soc.clock_limits[0].dppclk_mhz;
> >> - }
> >> - if (dc->debug.min_disp_clk_khz >
> >> pipes[pipe_idx].clks_cfg.dispclk_mhz * 1000)
> >> - pipes[pipe_idx].clks_cfg.dispclk_mhz =
> >> dc->debug.min_disp_clk_khz / 1000.0;
> >> - if (dc->debug.min_dpp_clk_khz >
> >> pipes[pipe_idx].clks_cfg.dppclk_mhz * 1000)
> >> - pipes[pipe_idx].clks_cfg.dppclk_mhz =
> >> dc->debug.min_dpp_clk_khz / 1000.0;
> >> -
> >> - pipe_idx++;
> >> - }
> >> -
> >> - dcn20_calculate_dlg_params(dc, context, pipes, pipe_cnt, vlevel);
> >> -}
> >> -
> >> static struct resource_funcs dcn301_res_pool_funcs = {
> >> .destroy = dcn301_destroy_resource_pool,
> >> .link_enc_create = dcn301_link_encoder_create,
> >> .panel_cntl_create = dcn301_panel_cntl_create,
> >> .validate_bandwidth = dcn30_validate_bandwidth,
> >> - .calculate_wm_and_dlg = dcn301_calculate_wm_and_dlg,
> >> + .calculate_wm_and_dlg = dcn30_calculate_wm_and_dlg,
> >
> > Hi Zhan,
> >
> > Using dcn30_calculate_wm_and_dlg smells fishy, IIRC watermark
> > calculations for DPUG and APU are very different. It's likely that
> > you're now picking up corrupted values form the wm_table.
> >
> > Take a look at how struct wm_table is populated in vg_clk_mgr.c v.s.
> > dcn30_clk_mgr.c. For APU, wm_table.entries are populated, whereas for
> > DGPU, wm_table.nv_entries are populated. .entries and .nv_entries are
> > under a union, with very different struct definitions.
> >
> > Have you taken a look at whether the pstate latency and sr enter/exit
> > latency values being used after your change are sensible? It could be
> > that you simply needed to raise these watermarks.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Leo
>
> After some DMs, it looks like this change is simply restoring an
> accidental revert that occurred due to a recent rebase. Given that this
> is needed to fix a regression,
>
> Acked-by: Leo Li <sunpeng.li@xxxxxxx>
>
> Nevertheless, this still looks iffy. I'm not sure if the pstate and sr
> enter/exit latencies being used here are what you expect.
I agree. The original patch that fixed this looks like a bit of a hack:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=0e4c0ae59d7e
We should figure out what parameters are causing problems.
Alex
>
> Thanks,
> Leo
>
> >
> >> .update_soc_for_wm_a = dcn30_update_soc_for_wm_a,
> >> .populate_dml_pipes = dcn30_populate_dml_pipes_from_context,
> >> .acquire_idle_pipe_for_layer =
> >> dcn20_acquire_idle_pipe_for_layer,
> >> --
> >> 2.31.1
> >>
