Series is,
Reviewed-by: Luben Tuikov <luben.tuikov@xxxxxxx>
Regards,
Luben
On 2021-07-03 5:44 a.m., Dan Carpenter wrote:
> If amdgpu_eeprom_read() returns a negative error code then the error
> handling checks:
>
> if (res < buf_size) {
>
> The problem is that "buf_size" is a u32 so negative values are type
> promoted to a high positive values and the condition is false. Fix
> this by changing the type of "buf_size" to int.
>
> Fixes: 79beb6114014 ("drm/amdgpu: Optimize EEPROM RAS table I/O")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> It's hard for me to tell the exact upper bound that "buf_size" can be,
> but if it's over USHRT_MAX then we are well toasted.
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c
> index fc70620369e4..f07a456506ef 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c
> @@ -978,9 +978,8 @@ const struct file_operations amdgpu_ras_debugfs_eeprom_table_ops = {
> static int __verify_ras_table_checksum(struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control *control)
> {
> struct amdgpu_device *adev = to_amdgpu_device(control);
> - int res;
> + int buf_size, res;
> u8 csum, *buf, *pp;
> - u32 buf_size;
>
> buf_size = RAS_TABLE_HEADER_SIZE +
> control->ras_num_recs * RAS_TABLE_RECORD_SIZE;
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
