Re: [PATCH 1/1] drm/amdgpu: Read clock counter via MMIO to reduce delay

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 29.06.21 um 12:01 schrieb YuBiao Wang:
[Why]
GPU timing counters are read via KIQ under sriov, which will introduce
a delay.

[How]
It could be directly read by MMIO.

v2: Add additional check to prevent carryover issue.
v3: Only check for carryover for once to prevent performance issue.

Signed-off-by: YuBiao Wang <YuBiao.Wang@xxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Horace Chen <horace.chen@xxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v10_0.c | 12 ++++++++++--
  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v10_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v10_0.c
index ff7e9f49040e..82a5b7ab8dc5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v10_0.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v10_0.c
@@ -7610,6 +7610,7 @@ static int gfx_v10_0_soft_reset(void *handle)
  static uint64_t gfx_v10_0_get_gpu_clock_counter(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
  {
  	uint64_t clock;
+	uint64_t clock_lo, clock_hi, hi_check;

You could put that on one line.

amdgpu_gfx_off_ctrl(adev, false);
  	mutex_lock(&adev->gfx.gpu_clock_mutex);
@@ -7620,8 +7621,15 @@ static uint64_t gfx_v10_0_get_gpu_clock_counter(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
  			((uint64_t)RREG32_SOC15(SMUIO, 0, mmGOLDEN_TSC_COUNT_UPPER_Vangogh) << 32ULL);
  		break;
  	default:
-		clock = (uint64_t)RREG32_SOC15(SMUIO, 0, mmGOLDEN_TSC_COUNT_LOWER) |
-			((uint64_t)RREG32_SOC15(SMUIO, 0, mmGOLDEN_TSC_COUNT_UPPER) << 32ULL);
+		clock_hi = RREG32_SOC15_NO_KIQ(SMUIO, 0, mmGOLDEN_TSC_COUNT_UPPER);
+		clock_lo = RREG32_SOC15_NO_KIQ(SMUIO, 0, mmGOLDEN_TSC_COUNT_LOWER);
+		hi_check = RREG32_SOC15_NO_KIQ(SMUIO, 0, mmGOLDEN_TSC_COUNT_UPPER);
+		// If carryover happens, update lower count again.

That is obvious and doesn't need a comment, but what you should comment is how unlikely a carry over is.

E.g. something like carry over only happens every x clock cycles which are roughly ~y days/weeks/month etc...

And as Monk noted as well please use kernel style comments.

Regards,
Christian.

+		if (hi_check != clock_hi) {
+			clock_lo = RREG32_SOC15_NO_KIQ(SMUIO, 0, mmGOLDEN_TSC_COUNT_LOWER);
+			clock_hi = hi_check;
+		}
+		clock = (uint64_t)clock_lo | ((uint64_t)clock_hi << 32ULL);
  		break;
  	}
  	mutex_unlock(&adev->gfx.gpu_clock_mutex);

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux