Re: [PATCH 2/7] drm/amdgpu: move shadow bo validation to VM code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 26.05.21 um 12:10 schrieb Nirmoy Das:
Do the shadow bo validation in the VM code as
VM code knows/owns shadow BOs.

Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@xxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c | 23 ++++-------------------
  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c |  5 +++++
  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c
index 90136f9dedd6..f6a8f0c5a52f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c
@@ -396,10 +396,10 @@ void amdgpu_cs_report_moved_bytes(struct amdgpu_device *adev, u64 num_bytes,
  	spin_unlock(&adev->mm_stats.lock);
  }
-static int amdgpu_cs_bo_validate(struct amdgpu_cs_parser *p,
-				 struct amdgpu_bo *bo)
+static int amdgpu_cs_bo_validate(void *param, struct amdgpu_bo *bo)
  {
  	struct amdgpu_device *adev = amdgpu_ttm_adev(bo->tbo.bdev);
+	struct amdgpu_cs_parser *p = param;
  	struct ttm_operation_ctx ctx = {
  		.interruptible = true,
  		.no_wait_gpu = false,
@@ -451,21 +451,6 @@ static int amdgpu_cs_bo_validate(struct amdgpu_cs_parser *p,
  	return r;
  }
-static int amdgpu_cs_validate(void *param, struct amdgpu_bo *bo)
-{
-	struct amdgpu_cs_parser *p = param;
-	int r;
-
-	r = amdgpu_cs_bo_validate(p, bo);
-	if (r)
-		return r;
-
-	if (bo->shadow)
-		r = amdgpu_cs_bo_validate(p, bo->shadow);
-
-	return r;
-}
-
  static int amdgpu_cs_list_validate(struct amdgpu_cs_parser *p,
  			    struct list_head *validated)
  {
@@ -493,7 +478,7 @@ static int amdgpu_cs_list_validate(struct amdgpu_cs_parser *p,
  						     lobj->user_pages);
  		}
- r = amdgpu_cs_validate(p, bo);
+		r = amdgpu_cs_bo_validate(p, bo);
  		if (r)
  			return r;
@@ -593,7 +578,7 @@ static int amdgpu_cs_parser_bos(struct amdgpu_cs_parser *p,
  	p->bytes_moved_vis = 0;
r = amdgpu_vm_validate_pt_bos(p->adev, &fpriv->vm,
-				      amdgpu_cs_validate, p);
+				      amdgpu_cs_bo_validate, p);
  	if (r) {
  		DRM_ERROR("amdgpu_vm_validate_pt_bos() failed.\n");
  		goto error_validate;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
index da155c276c51..f474f15ba344 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
@@ -696,6 +696,11 @@ int amdgpu_vm_validate_pt_bos(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct amdgpu_vm *vm,
  		r = validate(param, bo);
  		if (r)
  			return r;
+		if (bo->shadow) {
+			r = validate(param, bo);

This needs to be "validate(param, bo->shadow)".

Apart from that looks good to me.

Christian.

+			if (r)
+				return r;
+		}
if (bo->tbo.type != ttm_bo_type_kernel) {
  			amdgpu_vm_bo_moved(bo_base);

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux