Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Increase tlb flush timeout for sriov

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 19.05.21 um 11:32 schrieb Chengzhe Liu:
When there is 12 VF, we need to increase the timeout

NAK, 6 seconds is way to long to wait polling on a fence.

Why should an invalidation take that long? The engine are per VF just to avoid exactly that problem.

Christian.


Signed-off-by: Chengzhe Liu <ChengZhe.Liu@xxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v10_0.c | 6 +++++-
  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c  | 6 +++++-
  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v10_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v10_0.c
index f02dc904e4cf..a5f005c5d0ec 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v10_0.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v10_0.c
@@ -404,6 +404,7 @@ static int gmc_v10_0_flush_gpu_tlb_pasid(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
  	uint32_t seq;
  	uint16_t queried_pasid;
  	bool ret;
+	uint32_t sriov_usec_timeout = 6000000;  /* wait for 12 * 500ms for SRIOV */
  	struct amdgpu_ring *ring = &adev->gfx.kiq.ring;
  	struct amdgpu_kiq *kiq = &adev->gfx.kiq;
@@ -422,7 +423,10 @@ static int gmc_v10_0_flush_gpu_tlb_pasid(struct amdgpu_device *adev, amdgpu_ring_commit(ring);
  		spin_unlock(&adev->gfx.kiq.ring_lock);
-		r = amdgpu_fence_wait_polling(ring, seq, adev->usec_timeout);
+		if (amdgpu_sriov_vf(adev))
+			r = amdgpu_fence_wait_polling(ring, seq, sriov_usec_timeout);
+		else
+			r = amdgpu_fence_wait_polling(ring, seq, adev->usec_timeout);
  		if (r < 1) {
  			dev_err(adev->dev, "wait for kiq fence error: %ld.\n", r);
  			return -ETIME;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
index ceb3968d8326..e4a18d8f75c2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
@@ -857,6 +857,7 @@ static int gmc_v9_0_flush_gpu_tlb_pasid(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
  	uint32_t seq;
  	uint16_t queried_pasid;
  	bool ret;
+	uint32_t sriov_usec_timeout = 6000000;  /* wait for 12 * 500ms for SRIOV */
  	struct amdgpu_ring *ring = &adev->gfx.kiq.ring;
  	struct amdgpu_kiq *kiq = &adev->gfx.kiq;
@@ -896,7 +897,10 @@ static int gmc_v9_0_flush_gpu_tlb_pasid(struct amdgpu_device *adev, amdgpu_ring_commit(ring);
  		spin_unlock(&adev->gfx.kiq.ring_lock);
-		r = amdgpu_fence_wait_polling(ring, seq, adev->usec_timeout);
+		if (amdgpu_sriov_vf(adev))
+			r = amdgpu_fence_wait_polling(ring, seq, sriov_usec_timeout);
+		else
+			r = amdgpu_fence_wait_polling(ring, seq, adev->usec_timeout);
  		if (r < 1) {
  			dev_err(adev->dev, "wait for kiq fence error: %ld.\n", r);
  			up_read(&adev->reset_sem);

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux