Am 17.05.21 um 10:26 schrieb Jingwen Chen:
[Why]
the gem object rfb->base.obj[0] is get according to num_planes
in amdgpufb_create, but is not put according to num_planes
[How]
put rfb->base.obj[0] in amdgpu_fbdev_destroy according to num_planes
Signed-off-by: Jingwen Chen <Jingwen.Chen2@xxxxxxx>
Looks sane to me, but Alex might want to take a look as well.
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fb.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fb.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fb.c
index 4f10c4529840..09b048647523 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fb.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fb.c
@@ -288,10 +288,13 @@ static int amdgpufb_create(struct drm_fb_helper *helper,
static int amdgpu_fbdev_destroy(struct drm_device *dev, struct amdgpu_fbdev *rfbdev)
{
struct amdgpu_framebuffer *rfb = &rfbdev->rfb;
+ int i;
drm_fb_helper_unregister_fbi(&rfbdev->helper);
if (rfb->base.obj[0]) {
+ for (i = 0; i < rfb->base.format->num_planes; i++)
+ drm_gem_object_put(rfb->base.obj[0]);
amdgpufb_destroy_pinned_object(rfb->base.obj[0]);
rfb->base.obj[0] = NULL;
drm_framebuffer_unregister_private(&rfb->base);
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
