[AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]
Acked-by: Ramesh Errabolu <ramesh.errabolu@xxxxxxx>
-----Original Message-----
From: amd-gfx <amd-gfx-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Kuehling, Felix
Sent: Friday, April 23, 2021 2:23 AM
To: Zeng, Oak <Oak.Zeng@xxxxxxx>; amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/10] drm/amdgpu: Simplify AQL queue mapping
Am 2021-04-22 um 9:33 p.m. schrieb Zeng, Oak:
> Regards,
> Oak
>
>
>
> On 2021-04-21, 9:31 PM, "amd-gfx on behalf of Felix Kuehling" <amd-gfx-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Felix.Kuehling@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Do AQL queue double-mapping with a single attach call. That will make it
> easier to create per-GPU BOs later, to be shared between the two BO VA
> mappings on the same GPU.
>
> Freeing the attachments is not necessary if map_to_gpu fails. These will be
> cleaned up when the kdg_mem object is destroyed in
> amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_free_memory_of_gpu.
>
> Signed-off-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c | 103 ++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
> index 34c9a2d0028e..fbd7e786b54e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
> @@ -486,70 +486,76 @@ static uint64_t get_pte_flags(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct kgd_mem *mem)
> * 4a. Validate new page tables and directories
> */
> static int kfd_mem_attach(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct kgd_mem *mem,
> - struct amdgpu_vm *vm, bool is_aql,
> - struct kfd_mem_attachment **p_attachment)
> + struct amdgpu_vm *vm, bool is_aql)
> {
> unsigned long bo_size = mem->bo->tbo.base.size;
> uint64_t va = mem->va;
> - struct kfd_mem_attachment *attachment;
> - struct amdgpu_bo *bo;
> - int ret;
> + struct kfd_mem_attachment *attachment[2] = {NULL, NULL};
> + struct amdgpu_bo *bo[2] = {NULL, NULL};
> + int i, ret;
>
> if (!va) {
> pr_err("Invalid VA when adding BO to VM\n");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - if (is_aql)
> - va += bo_size;
> -
> - attachment = kzalloc(sizeof(*attachment), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!attachment)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> + for (i = 0; i <= is_aql; i++) {
> + attachment[i] = kzalloc(sizeof(*attachment[i]), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (unlikely(!attachment[i])) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto unwind;
> + }
>
> - pr_debug("\t add VA 0x%llx - 0x%llx to vm %p\n", va,
> - va + bo_size, vm);
> + pr_debug("\t add VA 0x%llx - 0x%llx to vm %p\n", va,
> + va + bo_size, vm);
>
> - /* FIXME: For now all attachments use the same BO. This is incorrect
> - * because one BO can only have one DMA mapping for one GPU. We need
> - * one BO per GPU, e.g. a DMABuf import with dynamic attachment. This
> - * will be addressed one BO-type at a time in subsequent patches.
> - */
> - bo = mem->bo;
> - drm_gem_object_get(&bo->tbo.base);
> + /* FIXME: For now all attachments use the same BO. This is
> + * incorrect because one BO can only have one DMA mapping
> + * for one GPU. We need one BO per GPU, e.g. a DMABuf
> + * import with dynamic attachment. This will be addressed
> + * one BO-type at a time in subsequent patches.
> + */
> + bo[i] = mem->bo;
> + drm_gem_object_get(&bo[i]->tbo.base);
>
> - /* Add BO to VM internal data structures*/
> - attachment->bo_va = amdgpu_vm_bo_add(adev, vm, bo);
> - if (!attachment->bo_va) {
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - pr_err("Failed to add BO object to VM. ret == %d\n",
> - ret);
> - goto err_vmadd;
> - }
> + /* Add BO to VM internal data structures */
> + attachment[i]->bo_va = amdgpu_vm_bo_add(adev, vm, bo[i]);
> Just for discussion. Are we allowed to add one bo twice to a vm? When I looked at amdgpu_vm_bo_base_init (called by amdgpu_vm_bo_add), line:
> bo->vm_bo = base;
> when you add the same bo to vm the second time, bo->vm_bo will be overwritten. I am not sure whether this will cause an issue later.
> This is not introduced by your code. The original code (calling kfd_mem_attach twice for aql) has the same problem.
If you just add one more line of context, you'll see that bo->vm_bo is the start of a single linked list of struct amdgpu_vm_bo_base. So adding a BO to a VM multiple times just extends that single-linked list:
base->next = bo->vm_bo;
bo->vm_bo = base;
Regards,
Felix
> + if (unlikely(!attachment[i]->bo_va)) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + pr_err("Failed to add BO object to VM. ret == %d\n",
> + ret);
> + goto unwind;
> + }
>
> - attachment->va = va;
> - attachment->pte_flags = get_pte_flags(adev, mem);
> - attachment->adev = adev;
> - list_add(&attachment->list, &mem->attachments);
> + attachment[i]->va = va;
> + attachment[i]->pte_flags = get_pte_flags(adev, mem);
> + attachment[i]->adev = adev;
> + list_add(&attachment[i]->list, &mem->attachments);
>
> - if (p_attachment)
> - *p_attachment = attachment;
> + va += bo_size;
> + }
>
> /* Allocate validate page tables if needed */
> ret = vm_validate_pt_pd_bos(vm);
> if (unlikely(ret)) {
> pr_err("validate_pt_pd_bos() failed\n");
> - goto err_alloc_pts;
> + goto unwind;
> }
>
> return 0;
>
> -err_alloc_pts:
> - amdgpu_vm_bo_rmv(adev, attachment->bo_va);
> - list_del(&attachment->list);
> -err_vmadd:
> - drm_gem_object_put(&bo->tbo.base);
> - kfree(attachment);
> +unwind:
> + for (; i >= 0; i--) {
> + if (!attachment[i])
> + continue;
> + if (attachment[i]->bo_va) {
> + amdgpu_vm_bo_rmv(adev, attachment[i]->bo_va);
> + list_del(&attachment[i]->list);
> + }
> + if (bo[i])
> + drm_gem_object_put(&bo[i]->tbo.base);
> + kfree(attachment[i]);
> + }
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -1382,8 +1388,6 @@ int amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_map_memory_to_gpu(
> uint32_t domain;
> struct kfd_mem_attachment *entry;
> struct bo_vm_reservation_context ctx;
> - struct kfd_mem_attachment *attachment = NULL;
> - struct kfd_mem_attachment *attachment_aql = NULL;
> unsigned long bo_size;
> bool is_invalid_userptr = false;
>
> @@ -1433,15 +1437,9 @@ int amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_map_memory_to_gpu(
> is_invalid_userptr = true;
>
> if (!kfd_mem_is_attached(avm, mem)) {
> - ret = kfd_mem_attach(adev, mem, avm, false, &attachment);
> + ret = kfd_mem_attach(adev, mem, avm, mem->aql_queue);
> if (ret)
> goto attach_failed;
> - if (mem->aql_queue) {
> - ret = kfd_mem_attach(adev, mem, avm, true,
> - &attachment_aql);
> - if (ret)
> - goto attach_failed_aql;
> - }
> } else {
> ret = vm_validate_pt_pd_bos(avm);
> if (unlikely(ret))
> @@ -1496,11 +1494,6 @@ int amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_map_memory_to_gpu(
> goto out;
>
> map_bo_to_gpuvm_failed:
> - if (attachment_aql)
> - kfd_mem_detach(attachment_aql);
> -attach_failed_aql:
> - if (attachment)
> - kfd_mem_detach(attachment);
> attach_failed:
> unreserve_bo_and_vms(&ctx, false, false);
> out:
> --
> 2.31.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> amd-gfx mailing list
> amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flist
> s.freedesktop.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Famd-gfx&data=04%7C01%7Cph
> ilip.yang%40amd.com%7Ca464efb3fc9e4139a80508d90628b3a0%7C3dd8961fe4884
> e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637547594180231281%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb
> 3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%
> 7C1000&sdata=D2seAdDqbmuCiDQzFTcv33Uyc8ELzu6zXxIralfCC8E%3D&re
> served=0
>
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.freedesktop.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Famd-gfx&data=04%7C01%7Cphilip.yang%40amd.com%7Ca464efb3fc9e4139a80508d90628b3a0%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637547594180231281%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=D2seAdDqbmuCiDQzFTcv33Uyc8ELzu6zXxIralfCC8E%3D&reserved=0
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
