Re: [PATCH v2 08/10] drm/amdgpu: Add DMA mapping of GTT BOs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Regards,
Oak 

 

On 2021-04-21, 9:31 PM, "amd-gfx on behalf of Felix Kuehling" <amd-gfx-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Felix.Kuehling@xxxxxxx> wrote:

    Use DMABufs with dynamic attachment to DMA-map GTT BOs on other GPUs.

    Signed-off-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@xxxxxxx>
    ---
     drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd.h    |  2 +
     .../gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c  | 76 ++++++++++++++++++-
     2 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

    diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd.h
    index 63668433f5a6..b706e5a54782 100644
    --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd.h
    +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd.h
    @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ struct amdgpu_device;
     enum kfd_mem_attachment_type {
     	KFD_MEM_ATT_SHARED,	/* Share kgd_mem->bo or another attachment's */
     	KFD_MEM_ATT_USERPTR,	/* SG bo to DMA map pages from a userptr bo */
    +	KFD_MEM_ATT_DMABUF,	/* DMAbuf to DMA map TTM BOs */
     };

     struct kfd_mem_attachment {
    @@ -56,6 +57,7 @@ struct kfd_mem_attachment {
     struct kgd_mem {
     	struct mutex lock;
     	struct amdgpu_bo *bo;
    +	struct dma_buf *dmabuf;
     	struct list_head attachments;
     	/* protected by amdkfd_process_info.lock */
     	struct ttm_validate_buffer validate_list;
    diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
    index 9eeedd0c7920..18a1f9222a59 100644
    --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
    +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
    @@ -524,6 +524,16 @@ kfd_mem_dmamap_userptr(struct kgd_mem *mem,
     	return ret;
     }

    +static int
    +kfd_mem_dmamap_dmabuf(struct kfd_mem_attachment *attachment)
    +{
    +	struct ttm_operation_ctx ctx = {.interruptible = true};
    +	struct amdgpu_bo *bo = attachment->bo_va->base.bo;
    +
    +	amdgpu_bo_placement_from_domain(bo, AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT);
    +	return ttm_bo_validate(&bo->tbo, &bo->placement, &ctx);
How does this work? The function name says this is dma mapping a buffer but from the implementation, it is just a placement and validation
    +}
    +
     static int
     kfd_mem_dmamap_attachment(struct kgd_mem *mem,
     			  struct kfd_mem_attachment *attachment)
    @@ -533,6 +543,8 @@ kfd_mem_dmamap_attachment(struct kgd_mem *mem,
     		return 0;
     	case KFD_MEM_ATT_USERPTR:
     		return kfd_mem_dmamap_userptr(mem, attachment);
    +	case KFD_MEM_ATT_DMABUF:
    +		return kfd_mem_dmamap_dmabuf(attachment);
     	default:
     		WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
     	}
    @@ -562,6 +574,19 @@ kfd_mem_dmaunmap_userptr(struct kgd_mem *mem,
     	ttm->sg = NULL;
     }

    +static void
    +kfd_mem_dmaunmap_dmabuf(struct kfd_mem_attachment *attachment)
    +{
    +	struct ttm_operation_ctx ctx = {.interruptible = true};
    +	struct amdgpu_bo *bo = attachment->bo_va->base.bo;
    +
    +	amdgpu_bo_placement_from_domain(bo, AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_CPU);
    +	ttm_bo_validate(&bo->tbo, &bo->placement, &ctx);
    +	/* FIXME: This does not guarantee that amdgpu_ttm_tt_unpopulate is
    +	 * called
    +	 */
    +}
    +
     static void
     kfd_mem_dmaunmap_attachment(struct kgd_mem *mem,
     			    struct kfd_mem_attachment *attachment)
    @@ -572,6 +597,9 @@ kfd_mem_dmaunmap_attachment(struct kgd_mem *mem,
     	case KFD_MEM_ATT_USERPTR:
     		kfd_mem_dmaunmap_userptr(mem, attachment);
     		break;
    +	case KFD_MEM_ATT_DMABUF:
    +		kfd_mem_dmaunmap_dmabuf(attachment);
    +		break;
     	default:
     		WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
     	}
    @@ -605,6 +633,38 @@ kfd_mem_attach_userptr(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct kgd_mem *mem,
     	return 0;
     }

    +static int
    +kfd_mem_attach_dmabuf(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct kgd_mem *mem,
    +		      struct amdgpu_bo **bo)
    +{
    +	struct drm_gem_object *gobj;
    +
    +	if (!mem->dmabuf) {
    +		mem->dmabuf = amdgpu_gem_prime_export(&mem->bo->tbo.base,
    +			mem->alloc_flags & KFD_IOC_ALLOC_MEM_FLAGS_WRITABLE ?
    +				DRM_RDWR : 0);
    +		if (IS_ERR(mem->dmabuf)) {
    +			mem->dmabuf = NULL;
    +			return PTR_ERR(mem->dmabuf);
    +		}
    +	}
    +
    +	gobj = amdgpu_gem_prime_import(&adev->ddev, mem->dmabuf);
    +	if (IS_ERR(gobj))
    +		return PTR_ERR(gobj);
    +
    +	/* Import takes an extra reference on the dmabuf. Drop it now to
    +	 * avoid leaking it. We only need the one reference in
    +	 * kgd_mem->dmabuf.
    +	 */
    +	dma_buf_put(mem->dmabuf);
    +
    +	*bo = gem_to_amdgpu_bo(gobj);
    +	(*bo)->parent = amdgpu_bo_ref(mem->bo);
    +
    +	return 0;
    +}
    +
     /* kfd_mem_attach - Add a BO to a VM
      *
      * Everything that needs to bo done only once when a BO is first added
    @@ -662,8 +722,20 @@ static int kfd_mem_attach(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct kgd_mem *mem,
     			ret = kfd_mem_attach_userptr(adev, mem, &bo[i]);
     			if (ret)
     				goto unwind;
    +		} else if (mem->domain == AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT &&
    +			   mem->bo->tbo.type != ttm_bo_type_sg) {
    +			/* GTT BOs use DMA-mapping ability of dynamic-attach
    +			 * DMA bufs. TODO: The same should work for VRAM on
    +			 * large-BAR GPUs.
    +			 */
    +			attachment[i]->type = KFD_MEM_ATT_DMABUF;
    +			ret = kfd_mem_attach_dmabuf(adev, mem, &bo[i]);
    +			if (ret)
    +				goto unwind;
     		} else {
    -			/* FIXME: Need to DMA-map other BO types */
    +			/* FIXME: Need to DMA-map other BO types:
    +			 * large-BAR VRAM, doorbells, MMIO remap
    +			 */
     			attachment[i]->type = KFD_MEM_ATT_SHARED;
     			bo[i] = mem->bo;
     			drm_gem_object_get(&bo[i]->tbo.base);
    @@ -1522,6 +1594,8 @@ int amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_free_memory_of_gpu(

     	/* Free the BO*/
     	drm_vma_node_revoke(&mem->bo->tbo.base.vma_node, drm_priv);
    +	if (mem->dmabuf)
    +		dma_buf_put(mem->dmabuf);
     	drm_gem_object_put(&mem->bo->tbo.base);
     	mutex_destroy(&mem->lock);
     	kfree(mem);
    -- 
    2.31.1

    _______________________________________________
    amd-gfx mailing list
    amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.freedesktop.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Famd-gfx&amp;data=04%7C01%7Coak.zeng%40amd.com%7Ca14e8f1d4ba6450b5f1308d9052e630b%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637546519053906547%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=AD%2FnbE6kQDFHLTr0kbzZ2sl3jKwuOqUKfpPEcPHwwfY%3D&amp;reserved=0

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux