Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/pm: remove the "set" function of pp_dpm_mclk for vangogh

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 02:20:10PM +0800, Du, Xiaojian wrote:
> This patch is to remove the "set" function of pp_dpm_mclk for vangogh.
> For vangogh, mclk bonds with fclk, they will lock each other
> on the same perfomance level. But according to the smu message from pmfw,
> only fclk is allowed to set value manually, so remove the unnecessary
> code of "set" function for mclk.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xiaojian Du <Xiaojian.Du@xxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@xxxxxxx>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/vangogh_ppt.c | 6 ------
>  1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/vangogh_ppt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/vangogh_ppt.c
> index 61ff9a663b21..35904315c1f9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/vangogh_ppt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/vangogh_ppt.c
> @@ -1092,7 +1092,6 @@ static int vangogh_set_soft_freq_limited_range(struct smu_context *smu,
>  			return ret;
>  		break;
>  	case SMU_FCLK:
> -	case SMU_MCLK:
>  		ret = smu_cmn_send_smc_msg_with_param(smu,
>  							SMU_MSG_SetHardMinFclkByFreq,
>  							min, NULL);
> @@ -1180,7 +1179,6 @@ static int vangogh_force_clk_levels(struct smu_context *smu,
>  		if (ret)
>  			return ret;
>  		break;
> -	case SMU_MCLK:
>  	case SMU_FCLK:
>  		ret = vangogh_get_dpm_clk_limited(smu,
>  							clk_type, soft_min_level, &min_freq);
> @@ -1267,7 +1265,6 @@ static int vangogh_force_dpm_limit_value(struct smu_context *smu, bool highest)
>  		SMU_SOCCLK,
>  		SMU_VCLK,
>  		SMU_DCLK,
> -		SMU_MCLK,
>  		SMU_FCLK,
>  	};
>  
> @@ -1296,7 +1293,6 @@ static int vangogh_unforce_dpm_levels(struct smu_context *smu)
>  		enum smu_clk_type clk_type;
>  		uint32_t	feature;
>  	} clk_feature_map[] = {
> -		{SMU_MCLK,   SMU_FEATURE_DPM_FCLK_BIT},
>  		{SMU_FCLK, SMU_FEATURE_DPM_FCLK_BIT},
>  		{SMU_SOCCLK, SMU_FEATURE_DPM_SOCCLK_BIT},
>  		{SMU_VCLK, SMU_FEATURE_VCN_DPM_BIT},
> @@ -1428,7 +1424,6 @@ static int vangogh_set_performance_level(struct smu_context *smu,
>  		if (ret)
>  			return ret;
>  
> -		vangogh_force_clk_levels(smu, SMU_MCLK, 1 << mclk_mask);
>  		vangogh_force_clk_levels(smu, SMU_FCLK, 1 << fclk_mask);
>  		vangogh_force_clk_levels(smu, SMU_SOCCLK, 1 << soc_mask);
>  		vangogh_force_clk_levels(smu, SMU_VCLK, 1 << vclk_mask);
> @@ -1468,7 +1463,6 @@ static int vangogh_set_performance_level(struct smu_context *smu,
>  		if (ret)
>  			return ret;
>  
> -		vangogh_force_clk_levels(smu, SMU_MCLK, 1 << mclk_mask);
>  		vangogh_force_clk_levels(smu, SMU_FCLK, 1 << fclk_mask);
>  		break;
>  	case AMD_DPM_FORCED_LEVEL_PROFILE_PEAK:
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux