On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 09:19:32AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > On Fri, 05 Mar 2021, Roland Scheidegger wrote: > > > The vmwgfx ones look all good to me, so for > > 23-53: Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger <sroland@xxxxxxxxxx> > > That said, they were already signed off by Zack, so not sure what > > happened here. > > Yes, they were accepted at one point, then dropped without a reason. > > Since I rebased onto the latest -next, I had to pluck them back out of > a previous one. They should show up in linux-next again. We merge patches for next merge window even during the current merge window, but need to make sure they don't pollute linux-next. Occasionally the cut off is wrong so patches show up, and then get pulled again. Unfortunately especially the 5.12 merge cycle was very wobbly due to some confusion here. But your patches should all be in linux-next again (they are queued up for 5.13 in drm-misc-next, I checked that). Sorry for the confusion here. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
