Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Fix macro name _AMDGPU_TRACE_H_ in preprocessor if condition

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 27.12.20 um 11:53 schrieb Paul Menzel:
Dear Christian,


Am 27.12.20 um 10:38 schrieb Christian König:
Am 26.12.20 um 14:16 schrieb Paul Menzel:

Am 26.12.20 um 09:56 schrieb Chenyang Li:
Add an underscore in amdgpu_trace.h line 24 "_AMDGPU_TRACE_H".

Fixes: d38ceaf99ed0 ("drm/amdgpu: add core driver (v4)")

Well this Fixes tag is superfluous/misleading and should probably be removed.

Why is it misleading?

The purpose of a Fixes tag is to distinct into which stable sources a patch should be added.

E.g. if somebody maintains a backport which has the originally buggy patch then he can figure out that he needs this one as well.

But since this problem is there for as long as the driver existed that is pretty much superfluous and confusing.


Why was that added?

I asked for that, because that is the commit introducing the issue, and with that tag it’s  more likely to picked for the stable series.

Ah, yes that is a rather good idea. But we should probably use a "CC: stable@xxxxxxxxxx" tag instead since this patch can be added pretty much everywhere.

Thanks,
Christian.


[…]


Kind regards,

Paul

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux