Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Experimental freesync video mode optimization

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

(CC dri-devel, Pekka and Martin who might be interested in this as well.)

On Thursday, December 10th, 2020 at 7:48 PM, Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> This patchset enables freesync video mode usecase where the userspace
> can request a freesync compatible video mode such that switching to this
> mode does not trigger blanking.
>
> This feature is guarded by a module parameter which is disabled by
> default. Enabling this paramters adds additional modes to the driver
> modelist, and also enables the optimization to skip modeset when using
> one of these modes.

Thanks for working on this, it's an interesting feature! However I'd like to
take some time to think about the user-space API for this.

As I understand it, some new synthetic modes are added, and user-space can
perform a test-only atomic *without* ALLOW_MODESET to figure out whether it can
switch to a mode without blanking the screen.

However the exact modes amdgpu adds are just some guesses. I think it would be
great if user-space could control the min/max refresh rate values directly.
Not only this would remove the need for the kernel to hard-code "well-known
video refresh rates", but this would also enable more use-cases. For instance
some users might want to mitigate flickering on their screen by reducing the
VRR range. Some users might want to lower their screen refresh rate for power
savings.

What do you think? Would you be fine with adding min/max VRR range properties?

If you're scared about the user-space code requirement, I can provide that.

Thanks,

Simon Ser
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux