On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 4:37 PM Zack Rusin <zackr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On Dec 2, 2020, at 09:27, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > Am 02.12.20 um 09:01 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann: > >> Hi > >> Am 30.11.20 um 21:59 schrieb Zack Rusin: > >>> > >>> > >>>> On Nov 24, 2020, at 06:38, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Using struct drm_device.pdev is deprecated. Convert vmwgfx to struct > >>>> drm_device.dev. No functional changes. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@xxxxxxx> > >>>> Cc: Roland Scheidegger <sroland@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>>> --- > >>>> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_cmdbuf.c | 8 ++++---- > >>>> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.c | 27 +++++++++++++------------- > >>>> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fb.c | 2 +- > >>> > >>> Reviewed-by: Zack Rusin <zackr@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> Could you add this patch to the vmwgfx tree? > > > > AMD devs indicated that they'd prefer to merge the patchset trough drm-misc-next. If you're OK with that, I'd merge the vmwgfx patch through drm-misc-next as well. > > Sounds good. I’ll make sure to rebase our latest patch set on top of it when it’s in. Thanks! btw if you want to avoid multi-tree coordination headaches, we can also manage vmwgfx in drm-misc and give you & Roland commit rights there. Up to you. There is some scripting involved for now (but I hope whenever we move to gitlab we could do the checks server-side): https://drm.pages.freedesktop.org/maintainer-tools/getting-started.html Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
