Re: [PATCH 17/19] drm/radeon/radeon_kms: Fix misnaming of 'radeon_info_ioctl's dev param

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 07 Nov 2020, Sam Ravnborg wrote:

> Hi Lee,
> 
> On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 09:49:47PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
> > 
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c:226: warning: Function parameter or member 'dev' not described in 'radeon_info_ioctl'
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c:226: warning: Excess function parameter 'rdev' description in 'radeon_info_ioctl'
> > 
> > Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx>
> > Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
> > Cc: David Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c
> > index 0d8fbabffcead..21c206795c364 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c
> > @@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ static void radeon_set_filp_rights(struct drm_device *dev,
> >  /**
> >   * radeon_info_ioctl - answer a device specific request.
> >   *
> > - * @rdev: radeon device pointer
> > + * @dev: radeon device pointer
> >   * @data: request object
> >   * @filp: drm filp
> >   *
> 
> Delete all the kernel-doc annotation as we do not pull this file into
> the kernel-doc anyway.
> 
> Keep the /* Answer a device specific request */ part.
> 
> At least thats what I see as the best way to deal with it.

Demoting all headers, even if they are conformant, it not the way to
go.  Some contributors/maintainers prefer to keep the kernel-doc
(pretty colours, automated checking [a la, this patch!] and the-like)
formatting, even if they are not directly referenced from
/Documentation.

For now, so long as the build is happy, I am happy.

If you wish to make the build unhappy about this, you should take up
the argument to encompass `scripts/find-unused-docs.sh` into it.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux