Am 14.08.2020 17:53 schrieb Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@xxxxxxxxx>:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 11:22 AM Christian König
<christian.koenig@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hey Thomas & Alex,
>
> well the TTM and Nouveau changes look good to me, but this completely
> broke amdgpu.
>
> Alex any idea what is going on here?
What's broken in amdgpu? There shouldn't be any ttm changes in amdgpu
for drm-next. Those all go through drm-misc.
It's not a TTM change.
The backmerge of drm-next into drm-misc-next broke amdgpu so that even glxgears doesn't work anymore.
But each individual merge head still works fine as far as I can say.
Any idea how to track that down?
Christian.
Alex
>
> Regards,
> Christian.
>
> Am 12.08.20 um 21:10 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
> > Hi Christian and Ben,
> >
> > I backmerged drm-next into drm-misc-next and had a conflict between ttm
> > and nouveau. struct ttm_mem_res got renamed to struct ttm_resource. I
> > updated nouveau to the new name, test-built, and pushed the result to
> > drm-misc-next. If either of you has a minute, you may want to double
> > check the merge.
> >
> > Best regards
> > Thomas
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> amd-gfx mailing list
> amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url="">
_______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
