Re: [PATCH v3] drm/amdgpu: annotate a false positive recursive locking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 11.08.20 um 09:36 schrieb Chen, Guchun:
[AMD Public Use]

-	down_write(&adev->reset_sem);
+	if (hive) {
+		down_write_nest_lock(&adev->reset_sem, &hive->hive_lock);
+	} else
+		down_write(&adev->reset_sem);
Coding style nit pick: You should drop the {} here.

{} could not be dropped here, as down_write_nest_lock Is one macro with multiple lines, otherwise, build error would say 'else' missed one previous 'if'.
Instead of dropping, another {} should be added to else to include down_write(&adev->reset_sem), which makes the braces been balanced.

Interesting bug, that is something which should not happen with macros in the Linux kernel. They protection by "do { ... } while(0)" is mandatory here.

Let me take a look,
Christian.


Regards,
Guchun

-----Original Message-----
From: amd-gfx <amd-gfx-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Christian König
Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2020 2:53 PM
To: Li, Dennis <Dennis.Li@xxxxxxx>; amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher@xxxxxxx>; Kuehling, Felix <Felix.Kuehling@xxxxxxx>; Zhang, Hawking <Hawking.Zhang@xxxxxxx>; daniel@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] drm/amdgpu: annotate a false positive recursive locking

Am 11.08.20 um 04:12 schrieb Dennis Li:
[  584.110304] ============================================
[  584.110590] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
[  584.110876] 5.6.0-deli-v5.6-2848-g3f3109b0e75f #1 Tainted: G           OE
[  584.111164] --------------------------------------------
[  584.111456] kworker/38:1/553 is trying to acquire lock:
[  584.111721] ffff9b15ff0a47a0 (&adev->reset_sem){++++}, at:
amdgpu_device_gpu_recover+0x262/0x1030 [amdgpu] [  584.112112]
                 but task is already holding lock:
[  584.112673] ffff9b1603d247a0 (&adev->reset_sem){++++}, at:
amdgpu_device_gpu_recover+0x262/0x1030 [amdgpu] [  584.113068]
                 other info that might help us debug this:
[  584.113689]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

[  584.114350]        CPU0
[  584.114685]        ----
[  584.115014]   lock(&adev->reset_sem);
[  584.115349]   lock(&adev->reset_sem);
[  584.115678]
                  *** DEADLOCK ***

[  584.116624]  May be due to missing lock nesting notation

[  584.117284] 4 locks held by kworker/38:1/553:
[  584.117616]  #0: ffff9ad635c1d348 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.},
at: process_one_work+0x21f/0x630 [  584.117967]  #1: ffffac708e1c3e58
((work_completion)(&con->recovery_work)){+.+.}, at:
process_one_work+0x21f/0x630 [  584.118358]  #2: ffffffffc1c2a5d0
(&tmp->hive_lock){+.+.}, at: amdgpu_device_gpu_recover+0xae/0x1030 [amdgpu] [  584.118786]  #3: ffff9b1603d247a0 (&adev->reset_sem){++++}, at: amdgpu_device_gpu_recover+0x262/0x1030 [amdgpu] [  584.119222]
                 stack backtrace:
[  584.119990] CPU: 38 PID: 553 Comm: kworker/38:1 Kdump: loaded Tainted: G           OE     5.6.0-deli-v5.6-2848-g3f3109b0e75f #1
[  584.120782] Hardware name: Supermicro SYS-7049GP-TRT/X11DPG-QT,
BIOS 3.1 05/23/2019 [  584.121223] Workqueue: events
amdgpu_ras_do_recovery [amdgpu] [  584.121638] Call Trace:
[  584.122050]  dump_stack+0x98/0xd5
[  584.122499]  __lock_acquire+0x1139/0x16e0 [  584.122931]  ?
trace_hardirqs_on+0x3b/0xf0 [  584.123358]  ?
cancel_delayed_work+0xa6/0xc0 [  584.123771]  lock_acquire+0xb8/0x1c0
[  584.124197]  ? amdgpu_device_gpu_recover+0x262/0x1030 [amdgpu] [
584.124599]  down_write+0x49/0x120 [  584.125032]  ?
amdgpu_device_gpu_recover+0x262/0x1030 [amdgpu] [  584.125472]
amdgpu_device_gpu_recover+0x262/0x1030 [amdgpu] [  584.125910]  ?
amdgpu_ras_error_query+0x1b8/0x2a0 [amdgpu] [  584.126367]
amdgpu_ras_do_recovery+0x159/0x190 [amdgpu] [  584.126789]
process_one_work+0x29e/0x630 [  584.127208]  worker_thread+0x3c/0x3f0
[  584.127621]  ? __kthread_parkme+0x61/0x90 [  584.128014]
kthread+0x12f/0x150 [  584.128402]  ? process_one_work+0x630/0x630 [
584.128790]  ? kthread_park+0x90/0x90 [  584.129174]
ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50

Each adev has owned lock_class_key to avoid false positive recursive
locking.

v2:
1. register adev->lock_key into lockdep, otherwise lockdep will report
the below warning

[ 1216.705820] BUG: key ffff890183b647d0 has not been registered!
[ 1216.705924] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 1216.705972]
DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(1) [ 1216.705997] WARNING: CPU: 20 PID: 541 at
kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3743 lockdep_init_map+0x150/0x210

v3:
change to use down_write_nest_lock to annotate the false dead-lock
warning.

Signed-off-by: Dennis Li <Dennis.Li@xxxxxxx>

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
index 62ecac97fbd2..8a55b0bc044a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
@@ -4145,12 +4145,15 @@ static int amdgpu_do_asic_reset(struct amdgpu_hive_info *hive,
   	return r;
   }
-static bool amdgpu_device_lock_adev(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
+static bool amdgpu_device_lock_adev(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
+struct amdgpu_hive_info *hive)
   {
   	if (atomic_cmpxchg(&adev->in_gpu_reset, 0, 1) != 0)
   		return false;
- down_write(&adev->reset_sem);
+	if (hive) {
+		down_write_nest_lock(&adev->reset_sem, &hive->hive_lock);
+	} else
+		down_write(&adev->reset_sem);
Coding style nit pick: You should drop the {} here.

Apart from that the patch is Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>

atomic_inc(&adev->gpu_reset_counter);
   	switch (amdgpu_asic_reset_method(adev)) { @@ -4312,7 +4315,7 @@ int
amdgpu_device_gpu_recover(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
/* block all schedulers and reset given job's ring */
   	list_for_each_entry(tmp_adev, device_list_handle, gmc.xgmi.head) {
-		if (!amdgpu_device_lock_adev(tmp_adev)) {
+		if (!amdgpu_device_lock_adev(tmp_adev, hive)) {
   			DRM_INFO("Bailing on TDR for s_job:%llx, as another already in progress",
   				  job ? job->base.id : -1);
   			r = 0;
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.freedesktop.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Famd-gfx&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cguchun.chen%40amd.com%7C0a3fd06c0e774002a0e908d83dc337a0%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637327255952065510&amp;sdata=rJ%2BbWsWJ6NfPUinwUHxnRfVxYi%2Ft4JQCTtamMATrLws%3D&amp;reserved=0

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux