Am 29.06.20 um 14:13 schrieb Kent Russell:
This fixes the missing-prototypes warning for the amdgpu_fru_read_eeprom
function. Since we declare it in the header, we can make it un-static
Well is it used in different files? Otherwise we might just have unused
code in the module which can potentially raise a warning as well.
Christian.
Signed-off-by: Kent Russell <kent.russell@xxxxxxx>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
Change-Id: I2b9419365cb8b38bcfb6582df53b96c83861d6cf
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fru_eeprom.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fru_eeprom.h | 2 ++
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fru_eeprom.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fru_eeprom.c
index e811fecc540f..68ed16e4d8be 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fru_eeprom.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fru_eeprom.c
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ static bool is_fru_eeprom_supported(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
return false;
}
-static int amdgpu_fru_read_eeprom(struct amdgpu_device *adev, uint32_t addrptr,
+int amdgpu_fru_read_eeprom(struct amdgpu_device *adev, uint32_t addrptr,
unsigned char *buff)
{
int ret, size;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fru_eeprom.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fru_eeprom.h
index f29a8611d69b..f4024f1d66c9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fru_eeprom.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fru_eeprom.h
@@ -24,6 +24,8 @@
#ifndef __AMDGPU_FRU_EEPROM_H__
#define __AMDGPU_FRU_EEPROM_H__
+int amdgpu_fru_read_eeprom(struct amdgpu_device *adev, uint32_t addrptr,
+ unsigned char *buff);
int amdgpu_fru_get_product_info(struct amdgpu_device *adev);
#endif // __AMDGPU_PRODINFO_H__
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
