On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 04:23:46PM -0700, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> Hi, Peter,
>
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 09:09:28PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:55:29AM -0700, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> >
> > > Or do you suggest to add a random new flag in struct thread_info instead
> > > of a TIF flag?
> >
> > Why thread_info? What's wrong with something simple like the below. It
> > takes a bit from the 'strictly current' flags word.
> >
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> > index b62e6aaf28f0..fca830b97055 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> > @@ -801,6 +801,9 @@ struct task_struct {
> > /* Stalled due to lack of memory */
> > unsigned in_memstall:1;
> > #endif
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_PASID
> > + unsigned has_valid_pasid:1;
> > +#endif
> >
> > unsigned long atomic_flags; /* Flags requiring atomic access. */
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
> > index 142b23645d82..10b3891be99e 100644
> > --- a/kernel/fork.c
> > +++ b/kernel/fork.c
> > @@ -955,6 +955,10 @@ static struct task_struct *dup_task_struct(struct task_struct *orig, int node)
> > tsk->use_memdelay = 0;
> > #endif
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_PASID
> > + tsk->has_valid_pasid = 0;
> > +#endif
> > +
> > #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
> > tsk->active_memcg = NULL;
> > #endif
>
> Can I add "Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>"
> to this patch? I will send this patch in the next version of the series.
Sure, n/p.
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
