[AMD Public Use]
I think the real reason is we have " *hw_supported &= AMDGPU_RAS_BLOCK_MASK;" already, but the patch is:
Reviewed-by: Tao Zhou <tao.zhou1@xxxxxxx>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chen, Guchun <Guchun.Chen@xxxxxxx>
> Sent: 2020年6月2日 13:58
> To: amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Zhang, Hawking
> <Hawking.Zhang@xxxxxxx>; Zhou1, Tao <Tao.Zhou1@xxxxxxx>; Li,
> Dennis <Dennis.Li@xxxxxxx>; Clements, John <John.Clements@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Chen, Guchun <Guchun.Chen@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: remove RAS's useless code
>
> Module parameter amdgpu_ras_mask has been involved in the calculation of
> ras support capability, so drop this redundant code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guchun Chen <guchun.chen@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c
> index 79bb05d791bc..337bf2da7bdc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c
> @@ -1902,8 +1902,6 @@ int amdgpu_ras_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
> goto err_out;
> }
>
> - amdgpu_ras_mask &= AMDGPU_RAS_BLOCK_MASK;
> -
> if (amdgpu_ras_fs_init(adev)) {
> r = -EINVAL;
> goto err_out;
> --
> 2.17.1
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
