Am 06.05.20 um 21:01 schrieb Joe Perches:
On Tue, 2020-05-05 at 16:01 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
After the structure was padded to 1024 bytes, it is no longer
suitable for being a local variable, as the function surpasses
the warning limit for 32-bit architectures:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c:587:5: error: stack frame size of 1072 bytes in function 'amdgpu_ras_feature_enable' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than=]
int amdgpu_ras_feature_enable(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
^
Use kzalloc() instead to get it from the heap.
[]
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c
[]
@@ -588,19 +588,23 @@ int amdgpu_ras_feature_enable(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
struct ras_common_if *head, bool enable)
{
struct amdgpu_ras *con = amdgpu_ras_get_context(adev);
- union ta_ras_cmd_input info;
+ union ta_ras_cmd_input *info;
int ret;
if (!con)
return -EINVAL;
+ info = kzalloc(sizeof(union ta_ras_cmd_input), GFP_KERNEL);
Spaces were used for indentation here not a tab.
It might be useful to run your proposed patches through checkpatch
Is this an actual bug fix as the previous use didn't
zero unused info members?
+ if (!info)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
if (!enable) {
- info.disable_features = (struct ta_ras_disable_features_input) {
+ info->disable_features = (struct ta_ras_disable_features_input) {
.block_id = amdgpu_ras_block_to_ta(head->block),
.error_type = amdgpu_ras_error_to_ta(head->type),
};
} else {
- info.enable_features = (struct ta_ras_enable_features_input) {
+ info->enable_features = (struct ta_ras_enable_features_input) {
.block_id = amdgpu_ras_block_to_ta(head->block),
.error_type = amdgpu_ras_error_to_ta(head->type),
};
@@ -609,26 +613,33 @@ int amdgpu_ras_feature_enable(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
/* Do not enable if it is not allowed. */
WARN_ON(enable && !amdgpu_ras_is_feature_allowed(adev, head));
/* Are we alerady in that state we are going to set? */
- if (!(!!enable ^ !!amdgpu_ras_is_feature_enabled(adev, head)))
- return 0;
+ if (!(!!enable ^ !!amdgpu_ras_is_feature_enabled(adev, head))) {
And trivia:
The !! uses with bool seem unnecessary and it's probably better
to make amdgpu_ras_is_feature_enabled to return bool.
Maybe something like:
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c
index 538895cfd862..05c4eaf0ddfa 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c
@@ -526,16 +526,16 @@ void amdgpu_ras_parse_status_code(struct amdgpu_device* adev,
}
/* feature ctl begin */
-static int amdgpu_ras_is_feature_allowed(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
- struct ras_common_if *head)
+static bool amdgpu_ras_is_feature_allowed(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
+ struct ras_common_if *head)
{
struct amdgpu_ras *con = amdgpu_ras_get_context(adev);
return con->hw_supported & BIT(head->block);
}
-static int amdgpu_ras_is_feature_enabled(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
- struct ras_common_if *head)
+static bool amdgpu_ras_is_feature_enabled(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
+ struct ras_common_if *head)
{
struct amdgpu_ras *con = amdgpu_ras_get_context(adev);
@@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ static int __amdgpu_ras_feature_enable(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
*/
if (!amdgpu_ras_is_feature_allowed(adev, head))
return 0;
- if (!(!!enable ^ !!amdgpu_ras_is_feature_enabled(adev, head)))
+ if (!(enable ^ amdgpu_ras_is_feature_enabled(adev, head)))
And while we are at improving coding style I think that writing this as
"if (enabled == amdgpu_ras_is_feature_enabled(adev, head))" would be
much more readable.
Christian.
return 0;
if (enable) {
@@ -609,7 +609,7 @@ int amdgpu_ras_feature_enable(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
/* Do not enable if it is not allowed. */
WARN_ON(enable && !amdgpu_ras_is_feature_allowed(adev, head));
/* Are we alerady in that state we are going to set? */
- if (!(!!enable ^ !!amdgpu_ras_is_feature_enabled(adev, head)))
+ if (!(enable ^ amdgpu_ras_is_feature_enabled(adev, head)))
return 0;
if (!amdgpu_ras_intr_triggered()) {
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
