Re: [PATCH] drm/radeon: cleanup coding style a bit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 26.04.20 um 15:12 schrieb Bernard Zhao:
Maybe no need to check ws before kmalloc, kmalloc will check
itself, kmalloc`s logic is if ptr is NULL, kmalloc will just
return

Signed-off-by: Bernard Zhao <bernard@xxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>

I'm wondering why the automated scripts haven't found that one before.

---
  drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c | 3 +--
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c
index 2c27627b6659..f15b20da5315 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c
@@ -1211,8 +1211,7 @@ static int atom_execute_table_locked(struct atom_context *ctx, int index, uint32
  	SDEBUG("<<\n");
free:
-	if (ws)
-		kfree(ectx.ws);
+	kfree(ectx.ws);
  	return ret;
  }

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux