Maybe we could reduce the mutex_lock(&mem->lock)`s protected code area,
and noneed to protect pr_debug.
Signed-off-by: Bernard Zhao <bernard@xxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
index 327317c..3c3769e5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
@@ -1285,17 +1285,18 @@ int amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_free_memory_of_gpu(
struct bo_vm_reservation_context ctx;
struct ttm_validate_buffer *bo_list_entry;
int ret;
+ unsigned int mapped_to_gpu_memory;
mutex_lock(&mem->lock);
+ mapped_to_gpu_memory = mem->mapped_to_gpu_memory;
+ mutex_unlock(&mem->lock);
- if (mem->mapped_to_gpu_memory > 0) {
+ if (mapped_to_gpu_memory > 0) {
pr_debug("BO VA 0x%llx size 0x%lx is still mapped.\n",
mem->va, bo_size);
- mutex_unlock(&mem->lock);
return -EBUSY;
}
- mutex_unlock(&mem->lock);
/* lock is not needed after this, since mem is unused and will
* be freed anyway
*/
--
2.7.4
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
