Am 31.03.20 um 14:54 schrieb Nirmoy Das:
Move AMDGPU_RING_TYPE_KIQ at the end of amdgpu_ring_type enum
to sync amdgpu_ring_type values with AMDGPU_HW_IP_*
Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ring.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ring.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ring.h
index 080024d21d3e..121041369c42 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ring.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ring.h
@@ -52,11 +52,11 @@ enum amdgpu_ring_type {
AMDGPU_RING_TYPE_SDMA,
AMDGPU_RING_TYPE_UVD,
AMDGPU_RING_TYPE_VCE,
- AMDGPU_RING_TYPE_KIQ,
AMDGPU_RING_TYPE_UVD_ENC,
AMDGPU_RING_TYPE_VCN_DEC,
AMDGPU_RING_TYPE_VCN_ENC,
- AMDGPU_RING_TYPE_VCN_JPEG
+ AMDGPU_RING_TYPE_VCN_JPEG,
+ AMDGPU_RING_TYPE_KIQ
That is most likely not sufficient to keep the two enums in sync since
we are getting even more kernel internal ring types in the future.
We either need some form of static assert or your original approach of
defining AMDGPU_RING_TYPE_SDMA = AMDGPU_HW_IP_SDMA.....
Christian.
};
struct amdgpu_device;
--
2.25.1
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
