Re: [PATCH hmm 6/8] mm/hmm: reorganize how !pte_present is handled in hmm_vma_handle_pte()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH hmm 6/8] mm/hmm: reorganize how !pte_present is handled in hmm_vma_handle_pte()
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 10:11:25 +0100
Cc: Philip Yang <Philip.Yang@xxxxxxx>, Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@xxxxxxxxxx>, John Hubbard <jhubbard@xxxxxxxxxx>, Felix.Kuehling@xxxxxxx, dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, Jerome Glisse <jglisse@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20200311183506.3997-7-jgg@ziepe.ca>
References: <20200311183506.3997-1-jgg@ziepe.ca> <20200311183506.3997-7-jgg@ziepe.ca>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)

Looks good:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

References:
- [PATCH hmm 0/8] Various error case bug fixes for hmm_range_fault()
  - From: Jason Gunthorpe
- [PATCH hmm 6/8] mm/hmm: reorganize how !pte_present is handled in hmm_vma_handle_pte()
  - From: Jason Gunthorpe

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH hmm 8/8] mm/hmm: add missing call to hmm_pte_need_fault in HMM_PFN_SPECIAL handling
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH hmm 9/8] mm/hmm: do not check pmd_protnone twice in hmm_vma_handle_pmd()
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH hmm 6/8] mm/hmm: reorganize how !pte_present is handled in hmm_vma_handle_pte()
Next by thread: [PATCH hmm 3/8] mm/hmm: do not call hmm_vma_walk_hole() while holding a spinlock
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux