From the semantic the dma_resv object contains a single exclusive and
multiple shared fences and it is mandatory that the shared fences
complete after the exclusive one.
Now what happens is that clearing the VM page tables runs asynchronously
to the exclusive fence which moves the buffer around.
And because of this Xinhui ran into a rare problem that TTM thought it
could reuse the memory while in reality it was still in use.
Regards,
Christian.
Am 12.03.20 um 12:30 schrieb Liu, Monk:
Can you give more details about " we can't guarantee the the clear fence will complete after the exclusive one." ?
Thanks
_____________________________________
Monk Liu|GPU Virtualization Team |AMD
-----Original Message-----
From: amd-gfx <amd-gfx-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Christian K?nig
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2020 7:12 PM
To: Pan, Xinhui <Xinhui.Pan@xxxxxxx>; amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: fix and cleanup amdgpu_gem_object_close
The problem is that we can't add the clear fence to the BO when there is an exclusive fence on it since we can't guarantee the the clear fence will complete after the exclusive one.
To fix this refactor the function and wait for any potential exclusive fence with a small timeout before adding the shared clear fence.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c | 41 +++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c
index 4277125a79ee..0782162fb5f3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c
@@ -161,10 +161,11 @@ void amdgpu_gem_object_close(struct drm_gem_object *obj,
struct amdgpu_bo_list_entry vm_pd;
struct list_head list, duplicates;
+ struct dma_fence *fence = NULL;
struct ttm_validate_buffer tv;
struct ww_acquire_ctx ticket;
struct amdgpu_bo_va *bo_va;
- int r;
+ long r;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&list);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&duplicates);
@@ -182,24 +183,32 @@ void amdgpu_gem_object_close(struct drm_gem_object *obj,
return;
}
bo_va = amdgpu_vm_bo_find(vm, bo);
- if (bo_va && --bo_va->ref_count == 0) {
- amdgpu_vm_bo_rmv(adev, bo_va);
+ if (!bo_va || --bo_va->ref_count)
+ goto out_unlock;
- if (amdgpu_vm_ready(vm)) {
- struct dma_fence *fence = NULL;
+ amdgpu_vm_bo_rmv(adev, bo_va);
+ if (!amdgpu_vm_ready(vm))
+ goto out_unlock;
- r = amdgpu_vm_clear_freed(adev, vm, &fence);
- if (unlikely(r)) {
- dev_err(adev->dev, "failed to clear page "
- "tables on GEM object close (%d)\n", r);
- }
- if (fence) {
- amdgpu_bo_fence(bo, fence, true);
- dma_fence_put(fence);
- }
- }
- }
+ r = amdgpu_vm_clear_freed(adev, vm, &fence);
+ if (r || !fence)
+ goto out_unlock;
+
+ r = dma_resv_wait_timeout_rcu(bo->tbo.base.resv, false, false,
+ msecs_to_jiffies(10));
+ if (r == 0)
+ r = -ETIMEDOUT;
+ if (r)
+ goto out_unlock;
+
+ amdgpu_bo_fence(bo, fence, true);
+ dma_fence_put(fence);
+
+out_unlock:
+ if (unlikely(r))
+ dev_err(adev->dev, "failed to clear page "
+ "tables on GEM object close (%d)\n", r);
ttm_eu_backoff_reservation(&ticket, &list); }
--
2.17.1
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.freedesktop.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Famd-gfx&data=02%7C01%7Cmonk.liu%40amd.com%7C3826cd029c9a4d00617008d7c6763433%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637196083320910768&sdata=1jCINJLzbYhXx9at5%2FU%2FX6d6476FhbhUYZrs53ARSAY%3D&reserved=0
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
