Re: [RFC PATCH 2/6] drm/radeon: don't use ttm bo->offset

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Looks like most of the patch is missing?

We should have quite a number of uses of the BO offset in radeon or do all of those go through radeon_bo_gpu_offset?

If yes then the change is much smaller than I thought i needs to be.

Christian.

Am 13.02.20 um 13:01 schrieb Nirmoy Das:
Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@xxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h        |  1 +
  drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.h | 16 +++++++++++++++-
  drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c    |  4 +---
  3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h
index d59b004f6695..97cfcc2870af 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h
@@ -2823,6 +2823,7 @@ extern void radeon_ttm_set_active_vram_size(struct radeon_device *rdev, u64 size
  extern void radeon_program_register_sequence(struct radeon_device *rdev,
  					     const u32 *registers,
  					     const u32 array_size);
+struct radeon_device *radeon_get_rdev(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev);
/*
   * vm
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.h
index d23f2ed4126e..4d37571c7ff5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.h
@@ -90,7 +90,21 @@ static inline void radeon_bo_unreserve(struct radeon_bo *bo)
   */
  static inline u64 radeon_bo_gpu_offset(struct radeon_bo *bo)
  {
-	return bo->tbo.offset;
+	struct radeon_device *rdev;
+	u64 start = 0;
+
+	rdev = radeon_get_rdev(bo->tbo.bdev);
+
+	switch(bo->tbo.mem.mem_type) {
+	case TTM_PL_TT:
+		start = rdev->mc.gtt_start;
+		break;
+	case TTM_PL_VRAM:
+		start = rdev->mc.vram_start;
+		break;
+	}
+
+	return (bo->tbo.mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT) + start;
  }
static inline unsigned long radeon_bo_size(struct radeon_bo *bo)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c
index 098bc9f40b98..b10654494262 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@
  static int radeon_ttm_debugfs_init(struct radeon_device *rdev);
  static void radeon_ttm_debugfs_fini(struct radeon_device *rdev);
-static struct radeon_device *radeon_get_rdev(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev)
+struct radeon_device *radeon_get_rdev(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev)
  {
  	struct radeon_mman *mman;
  	struct radeon_device *rdev;
@@ -87,7 +87,6 @@ static int radeon_init_mem_type(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, uint32_t type,
  		break;
  	case TTM_PL_TT:
  		man->func = &ttm_bo_manager_func;
-		man->gpu_offset = rdev->mc.gtt_start;
  		man->available_caching = TTM_PL_MASK_CACHING;
  		man->default_caching = TTM_PL_FLAG_CACHED;
  		man->flags = TTM_MEMTYPE_FLAG_MAPPABLE | TTM_MEMTYPE_FLAG_CMA;
@@ -109,7 +108,6 @@ static int radeon_init_mem_type(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, uint32_t type,
  	case TTM_PL_VRAM:
  		/* "On-card" video ram */
  		man->func = &ttm_bo_manager_func;
-		man->gpu_offset = rdev->mc.vram_start;
  		man->flags = TTM_MEMTYPE_FLAG_FIXED |
  			     TTM_MEMTYPE_FLAG_MAPPABLE;
  		man->available_caching = TTM_PL_FLAG_UNCACHED | TTM_PL_FLAG_WC;

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux