> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: 2020/February/12, Wednesday 11:05 AM
> To: Liu, Zhan <Zhan.Liu@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Deucher, Alexander
> <Alexander.Deucher@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/amdgpu/display move get_num_odm_splits()
> into dc_resource.c
>
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 10:58 AM Liu, Zhan <Zhan.Liu@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Please find my reply inline.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Zhan
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: amd-gfx <amd-gfx-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of
> > > Alex Deucher
> > > Sent: 2020/February/11, Tuesday 11:33 PM
> > > To: amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Cc: Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher@xxxxxxx>
> > > Subject: [PATCH 3/3] drm/amdgpu/display move get_num_odm_splits()
> > > into dc_resource.c
> > >
> > > It's used by more than just DCN2.0. Fixes missing symbol when
> > > amdgpu is built without DCN support.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > .../gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_resource.c | 16
> ++++++++++++++++
> > > .../drm/amd/display/dc/dcn20/dcn20_resource.c | 16 ----------------
> > > .../drm/amd/display/dc/dcn20/dcn20_resource.h | 1 -
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/inc/resource.h | 3 +++
> > > 4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_resource.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_resource.c
> > > index c02e5994d32b..572ce3842535 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_resource.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_resource.c
> > > @@ -532,6 +532,22 @@ static inline void get_vp_scan_direction(
> > > *flip_horz_scan_dir = !*flip_horz_scan_dir; }
> > >
> > > +int get_num_odm_splits(struct pipe_ctx *pipe) {
> > > + int odm_split_count = 0;
> > > + struct pipe_ctx *next_pipe = pipe->next_odm_pipe;
> > > + while (next_pipe) {
> > > + odm_split_count++;
> > > + next_pipe = next_pipe->next_odm_pipe;
> > > + }
> > > + pipe = pipe->prev_odm_pipe;
> > > + while (pipe) {
> > > + odm_split_count++;
> > > + pipe = pipe->prev_odm_pipe;
> > > + }
> > > + return odm_split_count;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static void calculate_split_count_and_index(struct pipe_ctx
> > > *pipe_ctx, int *split_count, int *split_idx) {
> > > *split_count = get_num_odm_splits(pipe_ctx); diff --git
> > > a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn20/dcn20_resource.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn20/dcn20_resource.c
> > > index 39026df56fa6..1061faccec9c 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn20/dcn20_resource.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn20/dcn20_resource.c
> > > @@ -1861,22 +1861,6 @@ void
> > > dcn20_populate_dml_writeback_from_context(
> > >
> > > }
> > >
> > > -int get_num_odm_splits(struct pipe_ctx *pipe) -{
> > > - int odm_split_count = 0;
> > > - struct pipe_ctx *next_pipe = pipe->next_odm_pipe;
> > > - while (next_pipe) {
> > > - odm_split_count++;
> > > - next_pipe = next_pipe->next_odm_pipe;
> > > - }
> > > - pipe = pipe->prev_odm_pipe;
> > > - while (pipe) {
> > > - odm_split_count++;
> > > - pipe = pipe->prev_odm_pipe;
> > > - }
> > > - return odm_split_count;
> > > -}
> > > -
> > > int dcn20_populate_dml_pipes_from_context(
> > > struct dc *dc, struct dc_state *context,
> > > display_e2e_pipe_params_st *pipes) { diff --git
> > > a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn20/dcn20_resource.h
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn20/dcn20_resource.h
> > > index 5180088ab6bc..f5893840b79b 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn20/dcn20_resource.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn20/dcn20_resource.h
> > > @@ -49,7 +49,6 @@ unsigned int dcn20_calc_max_scaled_time(
> > > unsigned int time_per_pixel,
> > > enum mmhubbub_wbif_mode mode,
> > > unsigned int urgent_watermark); -int
> > > get_num_odm_splits(struct pipe_ctx *pipe); int
> >
> > Seems like the "int" at the end of this line actually belongs to the next line.
> > I am wondering is it a typo or a format-patch glitch?
>
> Actual patch is correct:
> https://cgit.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/linux/commit/?h=drm-next&id=c8d2c8eaa3bbcaf8e2bc20f3e3203ed444f90bcc
I see. Thx!
This patch (and this patch series) is reviewed by:
Zhan Liu <zhan.liu@xxxxxxx>
>
> >
> > > dcn20_populate_dml_pipes_from_context(
> > > struct dc *dc, struct dc_state *context,
> > > display_e2e_pipe_params_st *pipes); struct pipe_ctx
> > > *dcn20_acquire_idle_pipe_for_layer(
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/inc/resource.h
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/inc/resource.h
> > > index 5ae8ada154ef..ca4c36c0c9bc 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/inc/resource.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/inc/resource.h
> > > @@ -179,4 +179,7 @@ unsigned int
> resource_pixel_format_to_bpp(enum
> > > surface_pixel_format format);
> > >
> > > void get_audio_check(struct audio_info *aud_modes,
> > > struct audio_check *aud_chk);
> > > +
> > > +int get_num_odm_splits(struct pipe_ctx *pipe);
> > > +
> > > #endif /* DRIVERS_GPU_DRM_AMD_DC_DEV_DC_INC_RESOURCE_H_
> */
> > > --
> > > 2.24.1
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > amd-gfx mailing list
> > > amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
