Am 15.01.20 um 18:21 schrieb Nirmoy Das:
This patch uses score based logic to select a new rq for better
loadbalance between multiple rq/scheds instead of num_jobs.
Below are test results after running amdgpu_test from mesa drm
Before this patch:
sched_name num of many times it got scheduled
========= ==================================
sdma0 314
sdma1 32
comp_1.0.0 56
comp_1.0.1 0
comp_1.1.0 0
comp_1.1.1 0
comp_1.2.0 0
comp_1.2.1 0
comp_1.3.0 0
comp_1.3.1 0
After this patch:
sched_name num of many times it got scheduled
========= ==================================
sdma0 216
sdma1 185
comp_1.0.0 39
comp_1.0.1 9
comp_1.1.0 12
comp_1.1.1 0
comp_1.2.0 12
comp_1.2.1 0
comp_1.3.0 12
comp_1.3.1 0
Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c | 10 +++++-----
drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c | 6 ++++--
include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h | 6 +++---
3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c
index 2e3a058fc239..33e2cd1089a2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ static struct drm_sched_rq *
drm_sched_entity_get_free_sched(struct drm_sched_entity *entity)
{
struct drm_sched_rq *rq = NULL;
- unsigned int min_jobs = UINT_MAX, num_jobs;
+ unsigned int min_score = UINT_MAX, num_score;
int i;
for (i = 0; i < entity->num_sched_list; ++i) {
@@ -141,9 +141,9 @@ drm_sched_entity_get_free_sched(struct drm_sched_entity *entity)
continue;
}
- num_jobs = atomic_read(&sched->num_jobs);
- if (num_jobs < min_jobs) {
- min_jobs = num_jobs;
+ num_score = atomic_read(&sched->score);
+ if (num_score < min_score) {
+ min_score = num_score;
rq = &entity->sched_list[i]->sched_rq[entity->priority];
}
}
@@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ void drm_sched_entity_push_job(struct drm_sched_job *sched_job,
bool first;
trace_drm_sched_job(sched_job, entity);
- atomic_inc(&entity->rq->sched->num_jobs);
+ atomic_inc(&entity->rq->sched->score);
WRITE_ONCE(entity->last_user, current->group_leader);
first = spsc_queue_push(&entity->job_queue, &sched_job->queue_node);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
index 3fad5876a13f..71ce6215956f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
@@ -92,6 +92,7 @@ void drm_sched_rq_add_entity(struct drm_sched_rq *rq,
if (!list_empty(&entity->list))
return;
spin_lock(&rq->lock);
+ atomic_inc(&rq->sched->score);
list_add_tail(&entity->list, &rq->entities);
spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
}
@@ -110,6 +111,7 @@ void drm_sched_rq_remove_entity(struct drm_sched_rq *rq,
if (list_empty(&entity->list))
return;
spin_lock(&rq->lock);
+ atomic_dec(&rq->sched->score);
list_del_init(&entity->list);
if (rq->current_entity == entity)
rq->current_entity = NULL;
@@ -655,7 +657,7 @@ static void drm_sched_process_job(struct dma_fence *f, struct dma_fence_cb *cb)
struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched = s_fence->sched;
atomic_dec(&sched->hw_rq_count);
- atomic_dec(&sched->num_jobs);
+ atomic_dec(&sched->score);
trace_drm_sched_process_job(s_fence);
@@ -830,7 +832,7 @@ int drm_sched_init(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched,
spin_lock_init(&sched->job_list_lock);
atomic_set(&sched->hw_rq_count, 0);
INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&sched->work_tdr, drm_sched_job_timedout);
- atomic_set(&sched->num_jobs, 0);
+ atomic_set(&sched->score, 0);
atomic64_set(&sched->job_id_count, 0);
/* Each scheduler will run on a seperate kernel thread */
diff --git a/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h b/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
index 96a1a1b7526e..537f7a4655a5 100644
--- a/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
+++ b/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
@@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ struct drm_sched_backend_ops {
* @job_list_lock: lock to protect the ring_mirror_list.
* @hang_limit: once the hangs by a job crosses this limit then it is marked
* guilty and it will be considered for scheduling further.
- * @num_jobs: the number of jobs in queue in the scheduler
+ * @score: score to help loadbalancer pick a idle sched
* @ready: marks if the underlying HW is ready to work
* @free_guilty: A hit to time out handler to free the guilty job.
*
@@ -282,8 +282,8 @@ struct drm_gpu_scheduler {
struct list_head ring_mirror_list;
spinlock_t job_list_lock;
int hang_limit;
- atomic_t num_jobs;
- bool ready;
+ atomic_t score;
+ bool ready;
bool free_guilty;
};
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
