Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: flush the fence on the bo after we individualize

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 15.01.20 um 07:26 schrieb Pan, Xinhui:
As we move the ttm_bo_individualize_resv() upwards, we need flush the
copied fence too. Otherwise the driver keeps waiting for fence.

run&Kill kfdtest, then perf top.

   25.53%  [ttm]                     [k] ttm_bo_delayed_delete
   24.29%  [kernel]                  [k] dma_resv_test_signaled_rcu
   19.72%  [kernel]                  [k] ww_mutex_lock

Fix: 378e2d5b("drm/ttm: fix ttm_bo_cleanup_refs_or_queue once more")
Signed-off-by: xinhui pan <xinhui.pan@xxxxxxx>

That's indeed a rather nice idea. Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>

I'm going to pick that up for inclusion in drm-misc-next. Please send TTM patches also to the dri-devel mailing list in the future.

Christian.

---
  drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 4 +++-
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
index 8d91b0428af1..1494aebb8128 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
@@ -499,8 +499,10 @@ static void ttm_bo_cleanup_refs_or_queue(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
dma_resv_unlock(bo->base.resv);
  	}
-	if (bo->base.resv != &bo->base._resv)
+	if (bo->base.resv != &bo->base._resv) {
+		ttm_bo_flush_all_fences(bo);
  		dma_resv_unlock(&bo->base._resv);
+	}
error:
  	kref_get(&bo->list_kref);

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux