Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: no SMC firmware reloading for non-RAS baco reset

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 10:25 PM Evan Quan <evan.quan@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> For non-RAS baco reset, there is no need to reset the SMC. Thus
> the firmware reloading should be avoided.
>
> Change-Id: I73f6284541d0ca0e82761380a27e32484fb0061c
> Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_psp.c |  3 ++-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/psp_v11_0.c  | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_psp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_psp.c
> index c14f2ccd0677..9bf7e92394f5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_psp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_psp.c
> @@ -1439,7 +1439,8 @@ static int psp_np_fw_load(struct psp_context *psp)
>                         continue;
>
>                 if (ucode->ucode_id == AMDGPU_UCODE_ID_SMC &&
> -                   (psp_smu_reload_quirk(psp) || psp->autoload_supported))
> +                   ((adev->in_gpu_reset && psp_smu_reload_quirk(psp))
> +                     || psp->autoload_supported))

Will this cover the power saving case as well?  Do we need to check
adev->in_gpu_reset as well or can we drop that part?

Alex

>                         continue;
>
>                 if (amdgpu_sriov_vf(adev) &&
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/psp_v11_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/psp_v11_0.c
> index c66ca8cc2ebd..ba761e9366e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/psp_v11_0.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/psp_v11_0.c
> @@ -676,6 +676,19 @@ static bool psp_v11_0_compare_sram_data(struct psp_context *psp,
>         return true;
>  }
>
> +/*
> + * Check whether SMU is still alive. If that's true
> + * (e.g. for non-RAS baco reset), we need to skip SMC firmware reloading.
> + */
> +static bool psp_v11_0_smu_reload_quirk(struct psp_context *psp)
> +{
> +       struct amdgpu_device *adev = psp->adev;
> +       uint32_t reg;
> +
> +       reg = RREG32_PCIE(smnMP1_FIRMWARE_FLAGS | 0x03b00000);
> +       return (reg & MP1_FIRMWARE_FLAGS__INTERRUPTS_ENABLED_MASK) ? true : false;
> +}
> +
>  static int psp_v11_0_mode1_reset(struct psp_context *psp)
>  {
>         int ret;
> @@ -1070,6 +1083,7 @@ static const struct psp_funcs psp_v11_0_funcs = {
>         .ring_stop = psp_v11_0_ring_stop,
>         .ring_destroy = psp_v11_0_ring_destroy,
>         .compare_sram_data = psp_v11_0_compare_sram_data,
> +       .smu_reload_quirk = psp_v11_0_smu_reload_quirk,
>         .mode1_reset = psp_v11_0_mode1_reset,
>         .xgmi_get_topology_info = psp_v11_0_xgmi_get_topology_info,
>         .xgmi_set_topology_info = psp_v11_0_xgmi_set_topology_info,
> --
> 2.24.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> amd-gfx mailing list
> amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux