I will fix the default case in switch.
Yong
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Kuehling, Felix <Felix.Kuehling@xxxxxxx>
*Sent:* Monday, December 16, 2019 2:39 PM
*To:* Zhao, Yong <Yong.Zhao@xxxxxxx>; amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
*Subject:* Re: [PATCH] drm/amdkfd: Improve function
get_sdma_rlc_reg_offset()
On 2019-12-13 8:38, Yong Zhao wrote:
> This prevents the NULL pointer access when there are fewer than 8 sdma
> engines.
I don't see where you got a NULL pointer in the old code. Also this
change is in an Arcturus-specific source file. AFAIK Arcturus always has
8 SDMA engines.
The new code is much longer than the old code. I don't see how that's an
improvement. See one more comment inline.
>
> Change-Id: Iabae9bff7546b344720905d5d4a5cfc066a79d25
> Signed-off-by: Yong Zhao <Yong.Zhao@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_arcturus.c | 64 ++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_arcturus.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_arcturus.c
> index 3c119407dc34..2ad088f10493 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_arcturus.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_arcturus.c
> @@ -71,32 +71,52 @@ static uint32_t get_sdma_rlc_reg_offset(struct
amdgpu_device *adev,
> unsigned int engine_id,
> unsigned int queue_id)
> {
> - uint32_t sdma_engine_reg_base[8] = {
> - SOC15_REG_OFFSET(SDMA0, 0,
> - mmSDMA0_RLC0_RB_CNTL) - mmSDMA0_RLC0_RB_CNTL,
> - SOC15_REG_OFFSET(SDMA1, 0,
> - mmSDMA1_RLC0_RB_CNTL) - mmSDMA1_RLC0_RB_CNTL,
> - SOC15_REG_OFFSET(SDMA2, 0,
> - mmSDMA2_RLC0_RB_CNTL) - mmSDMA2_RLC0_RB_CNTL,
> - SOC15_REG_OFFSET(SDMA3, 0,
> - mmSDMA3_RLC0_RB_CNTL) - mmSDMA3_RLC0_RB_CNTL,
> - SOC15_REG_OFFSET(SDMA4, 0,
> - mmSDMA4_RLC0_RB_CNTL) - mmSDMA4_RLC0_RB_CNTL,
> - SOC15_REG_OFFSET(SDMA5, 0,
> - mmSDMA5_RLC0_RB_CNTL) - mmSDMA5_RLC0_RB_CNTL,
> - SOC15_REG_OFFSET(SDMA6, 0,
> - mmSDMA6_RLC0_RB_CNTL) - mmSDMA6_RLC0_RB_CNTL,
> - SOC15_REG_OFFSET(SDMA7, 0,
> - mmSDMA7_RLC0_RB_CNTL) - mmSDMA7_RLC0_RB_CNTL
> - };
> -
> - uint32_t retval = sdma_engine_reg_base[engine_id]
I'm not sure where you were getting a NULL pointer, but I guess this
could have used a range check to make sure engine_id is < 8 before
indexing into the array. The equivalent in the switch statement would be
a default case. See below.
> + uint32_t sdma_engine_reg_base;
> + uint32_t sdma_rlc_reg_offset;
> +
> + switch (engine_id) {
> + case 0:
> + sdma_engine_reg_base = SOC15_REG_OFFSET(SDMA0, 0,
> + mmSDMA0_RLC0_RB_CNTL) -
mmSDMA0_RLC0_RB_CNTL;
> + break;
> + case 1:
> + sdma_engine_reg_base = SOC15_REG_OFFSET(SDMA1, 0,
> + mmSDMA1_RLC0_RB_CNTL) -
mmSDMA1_RLC0_RB_CNTL;
> + break;
> + case 2:
> + sdma_engine_reg_base = SOC15_REG_OFFSET(SDMA2, 0,
> + mmSDMA2_RLC0_RB_CNTL) -
mmSDMA2_RLC0_RB_CNTL;
> + break;
> + case 3:
> + sdma_engine_reg_base = SOC15_REG_OFFSET(SDMA3, 0,
> + mmSDMA3_RLC0_RB_CNTL) -
mmSDMA3_RLC0_RB_CNTL;
> + break;
> + case 4:
> + sdma_engine_reg_base = SOC15_REG_OFFSET(SDMA4, 0,
> + mmSDMA4_RLC0_RB_CNTL) -
mmSDMA4_RLC0_RB_CNTL;
> + break;
> + case 5:
> + sdma_engine_reg_base = SOC15_REG_OFFSET(SDMA5, 0,
> + mmSDMA5_RLC0_RB_CNTL) -
mmSDMA5_RLC0_RB_CNTL;
> + break;
> + case 6:
> + sdma_engine_reg_base = SOC15_REG_OFFSET(SDMA6, 0,
> + mmSDMA6_RLC0_RB_CNTL) -
mmSDMA6_RLC0_RB_CNTL;
> + break;
> + case 7:
> + sdma_engine_reg_base = SOC15_REG_OFFSET(SDMA7, 0,
> + mmSDMA7_RLC0_RB_CNTL) -
mmSDMA7_RLC0_RB_CNTL;
> + break;
> +
Do you need a default case for the switch statement? I think you get a
compiler warning without one.
Regards,
Felix
> + }
> +
> + sdma_rlc_reg_offset = sdma_engine_reg_base
> + queue_id * (mmSDMA0_RLC1_RB_CNTL -
mmSDMA0_RLC0_RB_CNTL);
>
> pr_debug("RLC register offset for SDMA%d RLC%d: 0x%x\n",
engine_id,
> - queue_id, retval);
> + queue_id, sdma_rlc_reg_offset);
>
> - return retval;
> + return sdma_rlc_reg_offset;
> }
>
> static int kgd_hqd_sdma_load(struct kgd_dev *kgd, void *mqd,
