On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 10:31 AM Michal Koutný <mkoutny@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 02:05:19AM -0400, Kenny Ho <Kenny.Ho@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > +struct cgroup_subsys drm_cgrp_subsys = { > > + .css_alloc = drmcg_css_alloc, > > + .css_free = drmcg_css_free, > > + .early_init = false, > > + .legacy_cftypes = files, > Do you really want to expose the DRM controller on v1 hierarchies (where > threads of one process can be in different cgroups, or children cgroups > compete with their parents)? (Sorry for the delay, I have been distracted by something else.) Yes, I am hoping to make the functionality as widely available as possible since the ecosystem is still transitioning to v2. Do you see inherent problem with this approach? Regards, Kenny > > > + .dfl_cftypes = files, > > +}; > > Just asking, > Michal _______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx