On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 6:15 PM Colin King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The variable ret is being initialized with a value that is never
> read and it is being updated later with a new value. The
> initialization is redundant and can be removed.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Applied. thanks!
Alex
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si_dpm.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si_dpm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si_dpm.c
> index 8148a7883de4..346315b3eebe 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si_dpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si_dpm.c
> @@ -5899,7 +5899,7 @@ static int si_patch_single_dependency_table_based_on_leakage(struct radeon_devic
>
> static int si_patch_dependency_tables_based_on_leakage(struct radeon_device *rdev)
> {
> - int ret = 0;
> + int ret;
>
> ret = si_patch_single_dependency_table_based_on_leakage(rdev,
> &rdev->pm.dpm.dyn_state.vddc_dependency_on_sclk);
> --
> 2.24.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
