On 2019-09-17 6:53 p.m., Pierre-Loup A. Griffais wrote: > > > On 9/12/19 10:32 AM, Pierre-Loup A. Griffais wrote: >> On 9/12/19 10:22 AM, Harry Wentland wrote: >>> On 2019-09-12 1:01 p.m., Kazlauskas, Nicholas wrote: >>>> On 2019-09-12 12:44 p.m., Pierre-Loup A. Griffais wrote: >>>>> It's otherwise properly supported, just needs exposing to userspace. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Loup A. Griffais <pgriffais@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> I know IGT has some tests for plane rotation, do you happen to know >>>> what >>>> tests pass or fail when exposing this? >>>> >>>> I think DCN1 (Raven) should work as expected but I'd be concerned about >>>> DCE or DCN2. I think we have had some cursor bugs in the past with >>>> cursor rotation but they might only be exposed when used in conjunction >>>> with overlay planes. >>>> >>> >>> Windows guys had a fix (in DC) for cursor with HW rotation on DCN a few >>> weeks ago. That might have fixed these issues. >>> >>> We should still make sure we can pass IGT tests that do rotation. >>> >>> How did you test? Weston? >> >> I've tested it with a patched kmscube to add the rotation property in >> the atomic path. 90, 180 and 270 all seem happy on Raven with that >> setup. I've not tested any other chip at this point. > > If there's more testing you'd like me to do, would anyone point me in > the right direction? I'm new to all this, sorry. I'd be mostly interested in getting IGT tests going for our CI so we have regular automated testing on the feature. The "kms_rotation_crc" test: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools/blob/master/tests/kms_rotation_crc.c ...looks like the correct test for this property but it seems like the test would need to be modified to use DRIVER_ANY instead of DRIVER_INTEL for drm_open_driver_master. It probably needs a few "is_i915_device(...)" checks placed before "intel_gen(...") checks as well since we don't support i915 tiling modifiers nor Intel generation checks. With those modifications I'd imagine it'd probably run as expected but I haven't had the chance to try it out. Nicholas Kazlauskas > > Thanks, > - Pierre-Loup > >> >>> >>> Harry >>> >>>> I'd just like to make sure there's suitable testing at least if we're >>>> going to expose this to userspace. >>>> >>>> Nicholas Kazlauskas >>>> >>>>> --- >>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c | 8 ++++++++ >>>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c >>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c >>>>> index 45be7a2132bb..3772763c6449 100644 >>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c >>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c >>>>> @@ -4680,6 +4680,7 @@ static int amdgpu_dm_plane_init(struct >>>>> amdgpu_display_manager *dm, >>>>> uint32_t formats[32]; >>>>> int num_formats; >>>>> int res = -EPERM; >>>>> + unsigned int supported_rotations; >>>>> num_formats = get_plane_formats(plane, plane_cap, formats, >>>>> ARRAY_SIZE(formats)); >>>>> @@ -4711,6 +4712,13 @@ static int amdgpu_dm_plane_init(struct >>>>> amdgpu_display_manager *dm, >>>>> DRM_COLOR_YCBCR_BT709, DRM_COLOR_YCBCR_LIMITED_RANGE); >>>>> } >>>>> + supported_rotations = >>>>> + DRM_MODE_ROTATE_0 | DRM_MODE_ROTATE_90 | >>>>> + DRM_MODE_ROTATE_180 | DRM_MODE_ROTATE_270; >>>>> + >>>>> + drm_plane_create_rotation_property(plane, DRM_MODE_ROTATE_0, >>>>> + supported_rotations); >>>>> + >>>>> drm_plane_helper_add(plane, &dm_plane_helper_funcs); >>>>> /* Create (reset) the plane state */ >>>>> >>>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> amd-gfx mailing list >> amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx > > _______________________________________________ > amd-gfx mailing list > amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx _______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
