Comment inline. Regards, Guchun -----Original Message----- From: Grodzovsky, Andrey <Andrey.Grodzovsky@xxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2019 10:41 PM To: Zhou1, Tao <Tao.Zhou1@xxxxxxx>; amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: Chen, Guchun <Guchun.Chen@xxxxxxx>; Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher@xxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Fix mutex lock from atomic context. On second though this will break what about reserving bad pages when resetting GPU for non RAS error reason such as manual reset ,S3 or ring timeout, (amdgpu_ras_resume->amdgpu_ras_reset_gpu) so i will keep the code as is. Another possible issue in existing code - looks like no reservation will take place in those case even now as amdgpu_ras_reserve_bad_pages data->last_reserved will be equal to data->count , no ? Looks like for this case you need to add flag to FORCE reservation for all pages from 0 to data->counnt. [Guchun]Yes, last_reserved is not updated any more, unless we unload our driver. So it maybe always equal to data->count, then no new bad page will be reserved. I see we have one eeprom reset by user, can we put this last_reserved clean operation to user in the same stack as well? Andrey On 9/11/19 10:19 AM, Andrey Grodzovsky wrote: > I like this much more, I will relocate to > amdgpu_umc_process_ras_data_cb an push. > > Andrey > > On 9/10/19 11:08 PM, Zhou1, Tao wrote: >> amdgpu_ras_reserve_bad_pages is only used by umc block, so another >> approach is to move it into amdgpu_umc_process_ras_data_cb. >> Anyway, either way is OK and the patch is: >> >> Reviewed-by: Tao Zhou <tao.zhou1@xxxxxxx> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky@xxxxxxx> >>> Sent: 2019年9月11日 3:41 >>> To: amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> Cc: Chen, Guchun <Guchun.Chen@xxxxxxx>; Zhou1, Tao >>> <Tao.Zhou1@xxxxxxx>; Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher@xxxxxxx>; >>> Grodzovsky, Andrey <Andrey.Grodzovsky@xxxxxxx> >>> Subject: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Fix mutex lock from atomic context. >>> >>> Problem: >>> amdgpu_ras_reserve_bad_pages was moved to amdgpu_ras_reset_gpu >>> because writing to EEPROM during ASIC reset was unstable. >>> But for ERREVENT_ATHUB_INTERRUPT amdgpu_ras_reset_gpu is called >>> directly from ISR context and so locking is not allowed. Also it's >>> irrelevant for this partilcular interrupt as this is generic RAS >>> interrupt and not memory errors specific. >>> >>> Fix: >>> Avoid calling amdgpu_ras_reserve_bad_pages if not in task context. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky@xxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.h | 4 +++- >>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.h >>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.h >>> index 012034d..dd5da3c 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.h >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.h >>> @@ -504,7 +504,9 @@ static inline int amdgpu_ras_reset_gpu(struct >>> amdgpu_device *adev, >>> /* save bad page to eeprom before gpu reset, >>> * i2c may be unstable in gpu reset >>> */ >>> - amdgpu_ras_reserve_bad_pages(adev); >>> + if (in_task()) >>> + amdgpu_ras_reserve_bad_pages(adev); >>> + >>> if (atomic_cmpxchg(&ras->in_recovery, 0, 1) == 0) >>> schedule_work(&ras->recovery_work); >>> return 0; >>> -- >>> 2.7.4 _______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
