> -----Original Message----- > From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2019 5:36 AM > To: Michel Dänzer <michel@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Deucher, Alexander > <Alexander.Deucher@xxxxxxx>; Koenig, Christian > <Christian.Koenig@xxxxxxx>; Zhou, David(ChunMing) > <David1.Zhou@xxxxxxx> > Cc: David Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxx>; dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; amd- > gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/radeon: Bail earlier when > radeon.cik_/si_support=0 is passed > > Hi, > > On 9/10/19 9:50 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > On 2019-09-07 10:32 p.m., Hans de Goede wrote: > >> Bail from the pci_driver probe function instead of from the > >> drm_driver load function. > >> > >> This avoid /dev/dri/card0 temporarily getting registered and then > >> unregistered again, sending unwanted add / remove udev events to > >> userspace. > >> > >> Specifically this avoids triggering the (userspace) bug fixed by this > >> plymouth merge-request: > >> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/plymouth/plymouth/merge_requests/59 > >> > >> Note that despite that being an userspace bug, not sending > >> unnecessary udev events is a good idea in general. > >> > >> BugLink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1490490 > >> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <mdaenzer@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Thank you for the review. I've drm push rights, but I guess that radeon/amd > GPU patches are collected by someone @AMD, so I do not need to / should > not push this myself, right? I'll pick this up later this week when I get home from travel. Thanks! Alex > > > amdgpu should be changed correspondingly as well. > > Good point. I'm currently travelling (@plumbers) I can do this when I'm back > home, but feel free to beat me to it (if you do please Cc me to avoid double > work). > > Regards, > > Hans _______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
