From: Grodzovsky, Andrey <Andrey.Grodzovsky@xxxxxxx> Sent: 2019年8月22日 23:07 To: Zhou1, Tao <Tao.Zhou1@xxxxxxx>; amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher@xxxxxxx>; Pan, Xinhui <Xinhui.Pan@xxxxxxx>; Zhang, Hawking <Hawking.Zhang@xxxxxxx>; Tuikov, Luben <Luben.Tuikov@xxxxxxx>; Lazar, Lijo <Lijo.Lazar@xxxxxxx>; Quan, Evan <Evan.Quan@xxxxxxx>; Panariti, David <David.Panariti@xxxxxxx>; Russell, Kent <Kent.Russell@xxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] drm/amdgpu: Add RAS EEPROM table. On 8/22/19 12:13 AM, Zhou1, Tao wrote: -----Original Message----- From: Andrey Grodzovsky mailto:andrey.grodzovsky@xxxxxxx Sent: 2019年8月22日 4:02 To: mailto:amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: Deucher, Alexander mailto:Alexander.Deucher@xxxxxxx; Pan, Xinhui mailto:Xinhui.Pan@xxxxxxx; Zhang, Hawking mailto:Hawking.Zhang@xxxxxxx; Tuikov, Luben mailto:Luben.Tuikov@xxxxxxx; Lazar, Lijo mailto:Lijo.Lazar@xxxxxxx; Quan, Evan mailto:Evan.Quan@xxxxxxx; Panariti, David mailto:David.Panariti@xxxxxxx; Russell, Kent mailto:Kent.Russell@xxxxxxx; Zhou1, Tao mailto:Tao.Zhou1@xxxxxxx; Grodzovsky, Andrey mailto:Andrey.Grodzovsky@xxxxxxx Subject: [PATCH v4 1/4] drm/amdgpu: Add RAS EEPROM table. Add RAS EEPROM table manager to eanble RAS errors to be stored upon appearance and retrived on driver load. v2: Fix some prints. v3: Fix checksum calculation. Make table record and header structs packed to do correct byte value sum. Fix record crossing EEPROM page boundry. v4: Fix byte sum val calculation for record - look at sizeof(record). Fix some style comments. Signed-off-by: Andrey Grodzovsky mailto:andrey.grodzovsky@xxxxxxx --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/Makefile | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.h | 3 + drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c | 482 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.h | 90 +++++ 4 files changed, 576 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.h diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/Makefile index 28d76bd..f016cf1 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/Makefile +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/Makefile @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ amdgpu-y += amdgpu_device.o amdgpu_kms.o \ amdgpu_gtt_mgr.o amdgpu_vram_mgr.o amdgpu_virt.o amdgpu_atomfirmware.o \ amdgpu_vf_error.o amdgpu_sched.o amdgpu_debugfs.o amdgpu_ids.o \ amdgpu_gmc.o amdgpu_xgmi.o amdgpu_csa.o amdgpu_ras.o amdgpu_vm_cpu.o \ - amdgpu_vm_sdma.o amdgpu_discovery.o + amdgpu_vm_sdma.o amdgpu_pmu.o amdgpu_discovery.o amdgpu_ras_eeprom.o amdgpu-$(CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS) += amdgpu_pmu.o diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.h index 2765f2d..8d5bcd8 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.h @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ #include "amdgpu.h" #include "amdgpu_psp.h" #include "ta_ras_if.h" +#include "amdgpu_ras_eeprom.h" enum amdgpu_ras_block { AMDGPU_RAS_BLOCK__UMC = 0, @@ -333,6 +334,8 @@ struct amdgpu_ras { struct mutex recovery_lock; uint32_t flags; + + struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control eeprom_control; }; struct ras_fs_data { diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..bf07515 --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c @@ -0,0 +1,482 @@ +/* + * Copyright 2019 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. + * + * Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person +obtaining a + * copy of this software and associated documentation files (the +"Software"), + * to deal in the Software without restriction, including without +limitation + * the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, +sublicense, + * and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom +the + * Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions: + * + * The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be +included in + * all copies or substantial portions of the Software. + * + * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, +EXPRESS OR + * IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF +MERCHANTABILITY, + * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT +SHALL + * THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER(S) OR AUTHOR(S) BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, +DAMAGES OR + * OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR +OTHERWISE, + * ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE +OR + * OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE. + * + */ + +#include "amdgpu_ras_eeprom.h" +#include "amdgpu.h" +#include "amdgpu_ras.h" +#include <linux/bits.h> + +#define EEPROM_I2C_TARGET_ADDR 0xA0 + +#define EEPROM_TABLE_HEADER_SIZE 20 +#define EEPROM_TABLE_RECORD_SIZE 24 [Tao] should we replace fixed value with sizeof for the two macros? No, as I already explained before the EEPROM_TABLE_HEADER/RECORD_SIZE represent the actual size in bytes that those entities occupy in the EEPROM memory and as defined in the EEPROM table description while struct eeprom_table_record would be larger because for example to store 6b of RetiedPage I have to use uint64 which is 8b. I could of course use some kind of bitvector (bitset) to store them compactly but it seems to me as an overkill. I was told we are not expecting to much records for any given system anyway during it's life time so the dynamic memory saved would be small anyway. [Tao] OK, could you add a comment in the code to clarify the two types of SIZE? +#define EEPROM_ADDRESS_SIZE 0x2 + +/* Table hdr is 'AMDR' */ +#define EEPROM_TABLE_HDR_VAL 0x414d4452 #define EEPROM_TABLE_VER +0x00010000 + +/* Assume 2 Mbit size */ +#define EEPROM_SIZE_BYTES 256000 +#define EEPROM_PAGE__SIZE_BYTES 256 +#define EEPROM_HDR_START 0 +#define EEPROM_RECORD_START (EEPROM_HDR_START + +EEPROM_TABLE_HEADER_SIZE) #define EEPROM_MAX_RECORD_NUM +((EEPROM_SIZE_BYTES - EEPROM_TABLE_HEADER_SIZE) / +EEPROM_TABLE_RECORD_SIZE) #define EEPROM_ADDR_MSB_MASK GENMASK(17, 8) + +#define to_amdgpu_device(x) (container_of(x, struct amdgpu_ras, +eeprom_control))->adev + +static void __encode_table_header_to_buff(struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_table_header *hdr, + unsigned char *buff) +{ + uint32_t *pp = (uint32_t *) buff; + + pp[0] = cpu_to_le32(hdr->header); + pp[1] = cpu_to_le32(hdr->version); + pp[2] = cpu_to_le32(hdr->first_rec_offset); + pp[3] = cpu_to_le32(hdr->tbl_size); + pp[4] = cpu_to_le32(hdr->checksum); +} + +static void __decode_table_header_from_buff(struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_table_header *hdr, + unsigned char *buff) +{ + uint32_t *pp = (uint32_t *)buff; + + hdr->header = le32_to_cpu(pp[0]); + hdr->version = le32_to_cpu(pp[1]); + hdr->first_rec_offset = le32_to_cpu(pp[2]); + hdr->tbl_size = le32_to_cpu(pp[3]); + hdr->checksum = le32_to_cpu(pp[4]); +} + +static int __update_table_header(struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control *control, + unsigned char *buff) +{ + int ret = 0; + struct i2c_msg msg = { + .addr = EEPROM_I2C_TARGET_ADDR, + .flags = 0, + .len = EEPROM_ADDRESS_SIZE + EEPROM_TABLE_HEADER_SIZE, + .buf = buff, + }; + + + *(uint16_t *)buff = EEPROM_HDR_START; + __encode_table_header_to_buff(&control->tbl_hdr, buff + +EEPROM_ADDRESS_SIZE); + + ret = i2c_transfer(&control->eeprom_accessor, &msg, 1); + if (ret < 1) + DRM_ERROR("Failed to write EEPROM table header, ret:%d", ret); + + return ret; +} + +static uint32_t __calc_hdr_byte_sum(struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control +*control); + +int amdgpu_ras_eeprom_init(struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control *control) { + int ret = 0; + struct amdgpu_device *adev = to_amdgpu_device(control); + unsigned char buff[EEPROM_ADDRESS_SIZE + EEPROM_TABLE_HEADER_SIZE] = { 0 }; + struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_table_header *hdr = &control->tbl_hdr; + struct i2c_msg msg = { + .addr = EEPROM_I2C_TARGET_ADDR, + .flags = I2C_M_RD, + .len = EEPROM_ADDRESS_SIZE + EEPROM_TABLE_HEADER_SIZE, + .buf = buff, + }; + + mutex_init(&control->tbl_mutex); + + switch (adev->asic_type) { + case CHIP_VEGA20: + /*TODO Add MI-60 */ + break; + + default: + return 0; + } + + if (ret) { + DRM_ERROR("Failed to init I2C controller, ret:%d", ret); + return ret; + } + + /* Read/Create table header from EEPROM address 0 */ + ret = i2c_transfer(&control->eeprom_accessor, &msg, 1); + if (ret < 1) { + DRM_ERROR("Failed to read EEPROM table header, ret:%d", ret); + return ret; + } + + __decode_table_header_from_buff(hdr, &buff[2]); + + if (hdr->header == EEPROM_TABLE_HDR_VAL) { + control->num_recs = (hdr->tbl_size - EEPROM_TABLE_HEADER_SIZE) / + EEPROM_TABLE_RECORD_SIZE; + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Found existing EEPROM table with %d records", + control->num_recs); + + } else { + DRM_INFO("Creating new EEPROM table"); + + hdr->header = EEPROM_TABLE_HDR_VAL; + hdr->version = EEPROM_TABLE_VER; + hdr->first_rec_offset = EEPROM_RECORD_START; + hdr->tbl_size = EEPROM_TABLE_HEADER_SIZE; + + adev->psp.ras.ras->eeprom_control.tbl_byte_sum = + __calc_hdr_byte_sum(&adev->psp.ras.ras- eeprom_control); + ret = __update_table_header(control, buff); + } + + /* Start inserting records from here */ + adev->psp.ras.ras->eeprom_control.next_addr = EEPROM_RECORD_START; + + return ret == 1 ? 0 : -EIO; +} + +void amdgpu_ras_eeprom_fini(struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control *control) +{ + struct amdgpu_device *adev = to_amdgpu_device(control); + + switch (adev->asic_type) { + case CHIP_VEGA20: + /*TODO Add MI-60 */ + break; + + default: + return; + } +} + +static void __encode_table_record_to_buff(struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control *control, + struct eeprom_table_record *record, + unsigned char *buff) +{ + __le64 tmp = 0; + int i = 0; + + /* Next are all record fields according to EEPROM page spec in LE foramt */ + buff[i++] = record->err_type; + + buff[i++] = record->bank; + + tmp = cpu_to_le64(record->ts); + memcpy(buff + i, &tmp, 8); + i += 8; [Tao] I think sizeof(record->ts) is better + + tmp = cpu_to_le64((record->offset & 0xffffffffffff)); [Tao] (0x1ULL << 49 - 1) is more readable than & 0xffffffffffff, or a macro can be defined, but either way is OK. + memcpy(buff + i, &tmp, 6); + i += 6; + + buff[i++] = record->mem_channel; + buff[i++] = record->mcumc_id; + + tmp = cpu_to_le64((record->retired_page & 0xffffffffffff)); + memcpy(buff + i, &tmp, 6); +} + +static void __decode_table_record_from_buff(struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control *control, + struct eeprom_table_record *record, + unsigned char *buff) +{ + __le64 tmp = 0; + int i = 0; + + /* Next are all record fields according to EEPROM page spec in LE foramt */ + record->err_type = buff[i++]; + + record->bank = buff[i++]; + + memcpy(&tmp, buff + i, 8); + record->ts = le64_to_cpu(tmp); + i += 8; + + memcpy(&tmp, buff + i, 6); + record->offset = (le64_to_cpu(tmp) & 0xffffffffffff); + i += 6; + + buff[i++] = record->mem_channel; + buff[i++] = record->mcumc_id; + + memcpy(&tmp, buff + i, 6); + record->retired_page = (le64_to_cpu(tmp) & 0xffffffffffff); } + +/* + * When reaching end of EEPROM memory jump back to 0 record address + * When next record access will go beyond EEPROM page boundary modify +bits A17/A8 + * in I2C selector to go to next page + */ +static uint32_t __correct_eeprom_dest_address(uint32_t curr_address) { + uint32_t next_address = curr_address + EEPROM_TABLE_RECORD_SIZE; + + /* When all EEPROM memory used jump back to 0 address */ + if (next_address > EEPROM_SIZE_BYTES) { + DRM_INFO("Reached end of EEPROM memory, jumping to 0 " + "and overriding old record"); + return EEPROM_RECORD_START; + } + + /* + * To check if we overflow page boundary compare next address with + * current and see if bits 17/8 of the EEPROM address will change + * If they do start from the next 256b page + * + * https://www.st.com/resource/en/datasheet/m24m02-dr.pdf sec. 5.1.2 + */ + if ((curr_address & EEPROM_ADDR_MSB_MASK) != (next_address & EEPROM_ADDR_MSB_MASK)) { + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Reached end of EEPROM memory page, jumpimng to next: %lx", + (next_address & EEPROM_ADDR_MSB_MASK)); + + return (next_address & EEPROM_ADDR_MSB_MASK); + } + + return curr_address; +} + + +static uint32_t __calc_hdr_byte_sum(struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control +*control) { + int i; + uint32_t tbl_sum = 0; + + /* Header checksum, skip checksum field in the calculation */ + for (i = 0; i < sizeof(control->tbl_hdr) - sizeof(control- tbl_hdr.checksum); i++) + tbl_sum += *(((unsigned char *)&control->tbl_hdr) + i); + + return tbl_sum; +} + +static uint32_t __calc_recs_byte_sum(struct eeprom_table_record *records, + int num) +{ + int i, j; + uint32_t tbl_sum = 0; + + /* Records checksum */ + for (i = 0; i < num; i++) { + struct eeprom_table_record *record = &records[i]; + + for (j = 0; j < sizeof(*record); j++) { + tbl_sum += *(((unsigned char *)record) + j); + } + } + + return tbl_sum; +} + +static inline uint32_t __calc_tbl_byte_sum(struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control *control, + struct eeprom_table_record *records, int num) { + return __calc_hdr_byte_sum(control) + __calc_recs_byte_sum(records, +num); } + +/* Checksum = 256 -((sum of all table entries) mod 256) */ static void +__update_tbl_checksum(struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control *control, + struct eeprom_table_record *records, int num, + uint32_t old_hdr_byte_sum) +{ + /* + * This will update the table sum with new records. + * + * TODO: What happens when the EEPROM table is to be wrapped around + * and old records from start will get overridden. + */ + + /* need to recalculate updated header byte sum */ + control->tbl_byte_sum -= old_hdr_byte_sum; + control->tbl_byte_sum += __calc_tbl_byte_sum(control, records, num); + + control->tbl_hdr.checksum = 256 - (control->tbl_byte_sum % 256); } [Tao] we can change 256 to EEPROM_PAGE__SIZE_BYTES This 256 just accidentally has same value as EEPROM_PAGE__SIZE_BYTES but doesn't relate in any way, it's part of byte value checksum algorithm I was given. Andrey + +/* table sum mod 256 + checksum must equals 256 */ static bool +__validate_tbl_checksum(struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control *control, + struct eeprom_table_record *records, int num) { + control->tbl_byte_sum = __calc_tbl_byte_sum(control, records, num); + + if (control->tbl_hdr.checksum + (control->tbl_byte_sum % 256) != 256) { + DRM_WARN("Checksum mismatch, checksum: %u ", control- tbl_hdr.checksum); + return false; + } + + return true; +} + +int amdgpu_ras_eeprom_process_recods(struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control *control, + struct eeprom_table_record *records, + bool write, + int num) +{ + int i, ret = 0; + struct i2c_msg *msgs; + unsigned char *buffs; + struct amdgpu_device *adev = to_amdgpu_device(control); + + if (adev->asic_type != CHIP_VEGA20) + return 0; + + buffs = kcalloc(num, EEPROM_ADDRESS_SIZE + EEPROM_TABLE_RECORD_SIZE, + GFP_KERNEL); + if (!buffs) + return -ENOMEM; + + mutex_lock(&control->tbl_mutex); + + msgs = kcalloc(num, sizeof(*msgs), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!msgs) { + ret = -ENOMEM; + goto free_buff; + } + + /* In case of overflow just start from beginning to not lose newest records */ + if (write && (control->next_addr + EEPROM_TABLE_RECORD_SIZE * num > EEPROM_SIZE_BYTES)) + control->next_addr = EEPROM_RECORD_START; + + + /* + * TODO Currently makes EEPROM writes for each record, this creates + * internal fragmentation. Optimized the code to do full page write of + * 256b + */ + for (i = 0; i < num; i++) { + unsigned char *buff = &buffs[i*(EEPROM_ADDRESS_SIZE + EEPROM_TABLE_RECORD_SIZE)]; + struct eeprom_table_record *record = &records[i]; + struct i2c_msg *msg = &msgs[i]; + + control->next_addr = +__correct_eeprom_dest_address(control->next_addr); + + /* + * Update bits 16,17 of EEPROM address in I2C address by setting them + * to bits 1,2 of Device address byte + */ + msg->addr = EEPROM_I2C_TARGET_ADDR | + ((control->next_addr & EEPROM_ADDR_MSB_MASK) >> 15); + msg->flags = write ? 0 : I2C_M_RD; + msg->len = EEPROM_ADDRESS_SIZE + EEPROM_TABLE_RECORD_SIZE; + msg->buf = buff; + + /* Insert the EEPROM dest addess, bits 0-15 */ + buff[0] = ((control->next_addr >> 8) & 0xff); + buff[1] = (control->next_addr & 0xff); + + /* EEPROM table content is stored in LE format */ + if (write) + __encode_table_record_to_buff(control, record, buff + +EEPROM_ADDRESS_SIZE); + + /* + * The destination EEPROM address might need to be corrected to account + * for page or entire memory wrapping + */ + control->next_addr += EEPROM_TABLE_RECORD_SIZE; + } + + ret = i2c_transfer(&control->eeprom_accessor, msgs, num); + if (ret < 1) { + DRM_ERROR("Failed to process EEPROM table records, ret:%d", ret); + + /* TODO Restore prev next EEPROM address ? */ + goto free_msgs; + } + + + if (!write) { + for (i = 0; i < num; i++) { + unsigned char *buff = &buffs[i*(EEPROM_ADDRESS_SIZE + EEPROM_TABLE_RECORD_SIZE)]; [Tao] space is needed before and after "*" + struct eeprom_table_record *record = &records[i]; [Tao] add a space after "*" + + __decode_table_record_from_buff(control, record, buff + EEPROM_ADDRESS_SIZE); + } + } + + if (write) { + uint32_t old_hdr_byte_sum = __calc_hdr_byte_sum(control); + + /* + * Update table header with size and CRC and account for table + * wrap around where the assumption is that we treat it as empty + * table + * + * TODO - Check the assumption is correct + */ + control->num_recs += num; + control->num_recs %= EEPROM_MAX_RECORD_NUM; + control->tbl_hdr.tbl_size += EEPROM_TABLE_RECORD_SIZE * num; + if (control->tbl_hdr.tbl_size > EEPROM_SIZE_BYTES) + control->tbl_hdr.tbl_size = EEPROM_TABLE_HEADER_SIZE + + control->num_recs * EEPROM_TABLE_RECORD_SIZE; + + __update_tbl_checksum(control, records, num, old_hdr_byte_sum); + + __update_table_header(control, buffs); + } else if (!__validate_tbl_checksum(control, records, num)) { + DRM_WARN("EEPROM Table checksum mismatch!"); + /* TODO Uncomment when EEPROM read/write is relliable */ + /* ret = -EIO; */ + } + +free_msgs: + kfree(msgs); + +free_buff: + kfree(buffs); + + mutex_unlock(&control->tbl_mutex); + + return ret == num ? 0 : -EIO; +} + +void amdgpu_ras_eeprom_test(struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control *control) +{ + int i; + struct eeprom_table_record *recs = kcalloc(1, sizeof(*recs), +GFP_KERNEL); + + if (!recs) + return; + + for (i = 0; i < 1 ; i++) { + recs[i].address = 0xdeadbeef; + recs[i].retired_page = i; + } + + if (!amdgpu_ras_eeprom_process_recods(control, recs, true, 1)) { + + memset(recs, 0, sizeof(*recs) * 1); + + control->next_addr = EEPROM_RECORD_START; + + if (!amdgpu_ras_eeprom_process_recods(control, recs, false, 1)) { + for (i = 0; i < 1; i++) + DRM_INFO("rec.address :0x%llx, rec.retired_page :%llu", + recs[i].address, recs[i].retired_page); + } else + DRM_ERROR("Failed in reading from table"); + + } else + DRM_ERROR("Failed in writing to table"); } diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000..41f3fcb --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.h @@ -0,0 +1,90 @@ +/* + * Copyright 2019 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. + * + * Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person +obtaining a + * copy of this software and associated documentation files (the +"Software"), + * to deal in the Software without restriction, including without +limitation + * the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, +sublicense, + * and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom +the + * Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions: + * + * The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be +included in + * all copies or substantial portions of the Software. + * + * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, +EXPRESS OR + * IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF +MERCHANTABILITY, + * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT +SHALL + * THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER(S) OR AUTHOR(S) BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, +DAMAGES OR + * OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR +OTHERWISE, + * ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE +OR + * OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE. + * + */ + +#ifndef _AMDGPU_RAS_EEPROM_H +#define _AMDGPU_RAS_EEPROM_H + +#include <linux/i2c.h> + +struct amdgpu_device; + +enum amdgpu_ras_eeprom_err_type{ + AMDGPU_RAS_EEPROM_ERR_PLACE_HOLDER, + AMDGPU_RAS_EEPROM_ERR_RECOVERABLE, + AMDGPU_RAS_EEPROM_ERR_NON_RECOVERABLE +}; + +struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_table_header { + uint32_t header; + uint32_t version; + uint32_t first_rec_offset; + uint32_t tbl_size; + uint32_t checksum; +}__attribute__((__packed__)); + +struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control { + struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_table_header tbl_hdr; + struct i2c_adapter eeprom_accessor; + uint32_t next_addr; + unsigned int num_recs; + struct mutex tbl_mutex; + bool bus_locked; + uint32_t tbl_byte_sum; +}; + +/* + * Represents single table record. Packed to be easily serialized into +byte + * stream. + */ +struct eeprom_table_record { + + union { + uint64_t address; + uint64_t offset; + }; + + uint64_t retired_page; + uint64_t ts; + + enum amdgpu_ras_eeprom_err_type err_type; + + union { + unsigned char bank; + unsigned char cu; + }; + + unsigned char mem_channel; + unsigned char mcumc_id; +}__attribute__((__packed__)); + +int amdgpu_ras_eeprom_init(struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control *control); +void amdgpu_ras_eeprom_fini(struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control *control); + +int amdgpu_ras_eeprom_process_recods(struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control *control, + struct eeprom_table_record *records, + bool write, + int num); + +void amdgpu_ras_eeprom_test(struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control *control); + +#endif // _AMDGPU_RAS_EEPROM_H -- 2.7.4 _______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
