On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 12:43:07AM +0000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 04:51:33PM -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote: > > > struct page. In this case any way we can update the > > nouveau_dmem_page() to check that page page->pgmap == the > > expected pgmap. > > I was also wondering if that is a problem.. just blindly doing a > container_of on the page->pgmap does seem like it assumes that only > this driver is using DEVICE_PRIVATE. > > It seems like something missing in hmm_range_fault, it should be told > what DEVICE_PRIVATE is acceptable to trigger HMM_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE > and fault all others? The whole device private handling in hmm and migrate_vma seems pretty broken as far as I can tell, and I have some WIP patches. Basically we should not touch (or possibly eventually call migrate to ram eventually in the future) device private pages not owned by the caller, where I try to defined the caller by the dev_pagemap_ops instance. _______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
