On 8/7/19 7:36 PM, Ira Weiny wrote:
On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 10:46:49AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:On Wed 07-08-19 10:37:26, Jan Kara wrote:On Fri 02-08-19 12:14:09, John Hubbard wrote:On 8/2/19 7:52 AM, Jan Kara wrote:On Fri 02-08-19 07:24:43, Matthew Wilcox wrote:On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 02:41:46PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:On Fri 02-08-19 11:12:44, Michal Hocko wrote:On Thu 01-08-19 19:19:31, john.hubbard@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
[...]
Before I go on, I would like to say that the "imbalance" of get_user_pages() and put_page() bothers me from a purist standpoint... However, since this discussion cropped up I went ahead and ported my work to Linus' current master (5.3-rc3+) and in doing so I only had to steal a bit of Johns code... Sorry John... :-( I don't have the commit messages all cleaned up and I know there may be some discussion on these new interfaces but I wanted to throw this series out there because I think it may be what Jan and Michal are driving at (or at least in that direction. Right now only RDMA and DAX FS's are supported. Other users of GUP will still fail on a DAX file and regular files will still be at risk.[2] I've pushed this work (based 5.3-rc3+ (33920f1ec5bf)) here[3]: https://github.com/weiny2/linux-kernel/tree/linus-rdmafsdax-b0-v3 I think the most relevant patch to this conversation is: https://github.com/weiny2/linux-kernel/commit/5d377653ba5cf11c3b716f904b057bee6641aaf6
ohhh...can you please avoid using the old __put_user_pages_dirty()
function? I thought I'd caught things early enough to get away with
the rename and deletion of that. You could either:
a) open code an implementation of vaddr_put_pages_dirty_lock() that
doesn't call any of the *put_user_pages_dirty*() variants, or
b) include my first patch ("") are part of your series, or
c) base this on Andrews's tree, which already has merged in my first patch.
thanks,
--
John Hubbard
NVIDIA
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
