On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 5:05 PM Kenny Ho <Kenny.Ho@xxxxxxx> wrote: > This is a follow up to the RFC I made previously to introduce a cgroup > controller for the GPU/DRM subsystem [v1,v2]. The goal is to be able to > provide resource management to GPU resources using things like container. > The cover letter from v1 is copied below for reference. > > [v1]: https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2018-November/197106.html > [v2]: https://www.spinics.net/lists/cgroups/msg22074.html > > v3: > Base on feedbacks on v2: > * removed .help type file from v2 > * conform to cgroup convention for default and max handling > * conform to cgroup convention for addressing device specific limits (with major:minor) > New function: > * adopted memparse for memory size related attributes > * added macro to marshall drmcgrp cftype private (DRMCG_CTF_PRIV, etc.) > * added ttm buffer usage stats (per cgroup, for system, tt, vram.) > * added ttm buffer usage limit (per cgroup, for vram.) > * added per cgroup bandwidth stats and limiting (burst and average bandwidth) > > v2: > * Removed the vendoring concepts > * Add limit to total buffer allocation > * Add limit to the maximum size of a buffer allocation > > v1: cover letter > > The purpose of this patch series is to start a discussion for a generic cgroup > controller for the drm subsystem. The design proposed here is a very early one. > We are hoping to engage the community as we develop the idea. > > > Backgrounds > ========== > Control Groups/cgroup provide a mechanism for aggregating/partitioning sets of > tasks, and all their future children, into hierarchical groups with specialized > behaviour, such as accounting/limiting the resources which processes in a cgroup > can access[1]. Weights, limits, protections, allocations are the main resource > distribution models. Existing cgroup controllers includes cpu, memory, io, > rdma, and more. cgroup is one of the foundational technologies that enables the > popular container application deployment and management method. > > Direct Rendering Manager/drm contains code intended to support the needs of > complex graphics devices. Graphics drivers in the kernel may make use of DRM > functions to make tasks like memory management, interrupt handling and DMA > easier, and provide a uniform interface to applications. The DRM has also > developed beyond traditional graphics applications to support compute/GPGPU > applications. > > > Motivations > ========= > As GPU grow beyond the realm of desktop/workstation graphics into areas like > data center clusters and IoT, there are increasing needs to monitor and regulate > GPU as a resource like cpu, memory and io. > > Matt Roper from Intel began working on similar idea in early 2018 [2] for the > purpose of managing GPU priority using the cgroup hierarchy. While that > particular use case may not warrant a standalone drm cgroup controller, there > are other use cases where having one can be useful [3]. Monitoring GPU > resources such as VRAM and buffers, CU (compute unit [AMD's nomenclature])/EU > (execution unit [Intel's nomenclature]), GPU job scheduling [4] can help > sysadmins get a better understanding of the applications usage profile. Further > usage regulations of the aforementioned resources can also help sysadmins > optimize workload deployment on limited GPU resources. > > With the increased importance of machine learning, data science and other > cloud-based applications, GPUs are already in production use in data centers > today [5,6,7]. Existing GPU resource management is very course grain, however, > as sysadmins are only able to distribute workload on a per-GPU basis [8]. An > alternative is to use GPU virtualization (with or without SRIOV) but it > generally acts on the entire GPU instead of the specific resources in a GPU. > With a drm cgroup controller, we can enable alternate, fine-grain, sub-GPU > resource management (in addition to what may be available via GPU > virtualization.) > > In addition to production use, the DRM cgroup can also help with testing > graphics application robustness by providing a mean to artificially limit DRM > resources availble to the applications. > > > Challenges > ======== > While there are common infrastructure in DRM that is shared across many vendors > (the scheduler [4] for example), there are also aspects of DRM that are vendor > specific. To accommodate this, we borrowed the mechanism used by the cgroup to > handle different kinds of cgroup controller. > > Resources for DRM are also often device (GPU) specific instead of system > specific and a system may contain more than one GPU. For this, we borrowed some > of the ideas from RDMA cgroup controller. Another question I have: What about HMM? With the device memory zone the core mm will be a lot more involved in managing that, but I also expect that we'll have classic buffer-based management for a long time still. So these need to work together, and I fear slightly that we'll have memcg and drmcg fighting over the same pieces a bit perhaps? Adding Jerome, maybe he has some thoughts on this. -Daniel > Approach > ======= > To experiment with the idea of a DRM cgroup, we would like to start with basic > accounting and statistics, then continue to iterate and add regulating > mechanisms into the driver. > > [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/cgroup-v1/cgroups.txt > [2] https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2018-January/153156.html > [3] https://www.spinics.net/lists/cgroups/msg20720.html > [4] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler > [5] https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/manage-gpus/scheduling-gpus/ > [6] https://blog.openshift.com/gpu-accelerated-sql-queries-with-postgresql-pg-strom-in-openshift-3-10/ > [7] https://github.com/RadeonOpenCompute/k8s-device-plugin > [8] https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/52757 > > Kenny Ho (11): > cgroup: Introduce cgroup for drm subsystem > cgroup: Add mechanism to register DRM devices > drm/amdgpu: Register AMD devices for DRM cgroup > drm, cgroup: Add total GEM buffer allocation limit > drm, cgroup: Add peak GEM buffer allocation limit > drm, cgroup: Add GEM buffer allocation count stats > drm, cgroup: Add TTM buffer allocation stats > drm, cgroup: Add TTM buffer peak usage stats > drm, cgroup: Add per cgroup bw measure and control > drm, cgroup: Add soft VRAM limit > drm, cgroup: Allow more aggressive memory reclaim > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c | 4 + > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c | 4 + > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c | 3 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c | 8 + > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c | 9 + > drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 91 ++ > drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c | 4 + > include/drm/drm_cgroup.h | 115 ++ > include/drm/drm_gem.h | 11 + > include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h | 2 + > include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h | 10 + > include/linux/cgroup_drm.h | 114 ++ > include/linux/cgroup_subsys.h | 4 + > init/Kconfig | 5 + > kernel/cgroup/Makefile | 1 + > kernel/cgroup/drm.c | 1171 ++++++++++++++++++++ > 16 files changed, 1555 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > create mode 100644 include/drm/drm_cgroup.h > create mode 100644 include/linux/cgroup_drm.h > create mode 100644 kernel/cgroup/drm.c > > -- > 2.21.0 > > _______________________________________________ > dri-devel mailing list > dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
