On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 06:52:50PM -0400, Kenny Ho wrote:
> Ok. I am not too familiar with shrinker but I will dig into it. Just
> so that I am looking into the right things, you are referring to
> things like struct shrinker and struct shrink_control?
Yeah. Reason I'm asking for this is this is how system memory is shrunk
right now, so at least having some conceptual similarities might be useful
here. And a lot of people have thought quite hard about system memory
shrinking and all that, so hopefully that gives us good design
inspiration.
-Daniel
>
> Regards,
> Kenny
>
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 12:44 PM Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 11:05:22AM -0400, Kenny Ho wrote:
> > > Allow DRM TTM memory manager to register a work_struct, such that, when
> > > a drmcgrp is under memory pressure, memory reclaiming can be triggered
> > > immediately.
> > >
> > > Change-Id: I25ac04e2db9c19ff12652b88ebff18b44b2706d8
> > > Signed-off-by: Kenny Ho <Kenny.Ho@xxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > include/drm/drm_cgroup.h | 14 ++++++++++
> > > include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h | 2 ++
> > > kernel/cgroup/drm.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 4 files changed, 96 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> > > index 79c530f4a198..5fc3bc5bd4c5 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> > > @@ -1509,6 +1509,44 @@ int ttm_bo_evict_mm(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, unsigned mem_type)
> > > }
> > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(ttm_bo_evict_mm);
> > >
> > > +static void ttm_bo_reclaim_wq(struct work_struct *work)
> > > +{
> >
> > I think a design a bit more inspired by memcg aware core shrinkers would
> > be nice, i.e. explicitly passing:
> > - which drm_cgroup needs to be shrunk
> > - which ttm_mem_reg (well the fancy new abstracted out stuff for tracking
> > special gpu memory resources like tt or vram or whatever)
> > - how much it needs to be shrunk
> >
> > I think with that a lot more the book-keeping could be pushed into the
> > drm_cgroup code, and the callback just needs to actually shrink enough as
> > requested.
> > -Daniel
> >
> > > + struct ttm_operation_ctx ctx = {
> > > + .interruptible = false,
> > > + .no_wait_gpu = false,
> > > + .flags = TTM_OPT_FLAG_FORCE_ALLOC
> > > + };
> > > + struct ttm_mem_type_manager *man =
> > > + container_of(work, struct ttm_mem_type_manager, reclaim_wq);
> > > + struct ttm_bo_device *bdev = man->bdev;
> > > + struct dma_fence *fence;
> > > + int mem_type;
> > > + int ret;
> > > +
> > > + for (mem_type = 0; mem_type < TTM_NUM_MEM_TYPES; mem_type++)
> > > + if (&bdev->man[mem_type] == man)
> > > + break;
> > > +
> > > + BUG_ON(mem_type >= TTM_NUM_MEM_TYPES);
> > > +
> > > + if (!drmcgrp_mem_pressure_scan(bdev, mem_type))
> > > + return;
> > > +
> > > + ret = ttm_mem_evict_first(bdev, mem_type, NULL, &ctx);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + return;
> > > +
> > > + spin_lock(&man->move_lock);
> > > + fence = dma_fence_get(man->move);
> > > + spin_unlock(&man->move_lock);
> > > +
> > > + if (fence) {
> > > + ret = dma_fence_wait(fence, false);
> > > + dma_fence_put(fence);
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > int ttm_bo_init_mm(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, unsigned type,
> > > unsigned long p_size)
> > > {
> > > @@ -1543,6 +1581,13 @@ int ttm_bo_init_mm(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, unsigned type,
> > > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&man->lru[i]);
> > > man->move = NULL;
> > >
> > > + pr_err("drmcgrp %p type %d\n", bdev->ddev, type);
> > > +
> > > + if (type <= TTM_PL_VRAM) {
> > > + INIT_WORK(&man->reclaim_wq, ttm_bo_reclaim_wq);
> > > + drmcgrp_register_device_mm(bdev->ddev, type, &man->reclaim_wq);
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(ttm_bo_init_mm);
> > > @@ -1620,6 +1665,8 @@ int ttm_bo_device_release(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev)
> > > man = &bdev->man[i];
> > > if (man->has_type) {
> > > man->use_type = false;
> > > + drmcgrp_unregister_device_mm(bdev->ddev, i);
> > > + cancel_work_sync(&man->reclaim_wq);
> > > if ((i != TTM_PL_SYSTEM) && ttm_bo_clean_mm(bdev, i)) {
> > > ret = -EBUSY;
> > > pr_err("DRM memory manager type %d is not clean\n",
> > > diff --git a/include/drm/drm_cgroup.h b/include/drm/drm_cgroup.h
> > > index 360c1e6c809f..134d6e5475f3 100644
> > > --- a/include/drm/drm_cgroup.h
> > > +++ b/include/drm/drm_cgroup.h
> > > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
> > > #define __DRM_CGROUP_H__
> > >
> > > #include <linux/cgroup_drm.h>
> > > +#include <linux/workqueue.h>
> > > #include <drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h>
> > > #include <drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h>
> > >
> > > @@ -12,6 +13,9 @@
> > >
> > > int drmcgrp_register_device(struct drm_device *device);
> > > int drmcgrp_unregister_device(struct drm_device *device);
> > > +void drmcgrp_register_device_mm(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned type,
> > > + struct work_struct *wq);
> > > +void drmcgrp_unregister_device_mm(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned type);
> > > bool drmcgrp_is_self_or_ancestor(struct drmcgrp *self,
> > > struct drmcgrp *relative);
> > > void drmcgrp_chg_bo_alloc(struct drmcgrp *drmcgrp, struct drm_device *dev,
> > > @@ -40,6 +44,16 @@ static inline int drmcgrp_unregister_device(struct drm_device *device)
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static inline void drmcgrp_register_device_mm(struct drm_device *dev,
> > > + unsigned type, struct work_struct *wq)
> > > +{
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static inline void drmcgrp_unregister_device_mm(struct drm_device *dev,
> > > + unsigned type)
> > > +{
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static inline bool drmcgrp_is_self_or_ancestor(struct drmcgrp *self,
> > > struct drmcgrp *relative)
> > > {
> > > diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
> > > index 4cbcb41e5aa9..0956ca7888fc 100644
> > > --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
> > > +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
> > > @@ -205,6 +205,8 @@ struct ttm_mem_type_manager {
> > > * Protected by @move_lock.
> > > */
> > > struct dma_fence *move;
> > > +
> > > + struct work_struct reclaim_wq;
> > > };
> > >
> > > /**
> > > diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/drm.c b/kernel/cgroup/drm.c
> > > index 1ce13db36ce9..985a89e849d3 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/cgroup/drm.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/cgroup/drm.c
> > > @@ -31,6 +31,8 @@ struct drmcgrp_device {
> > > s64 mem_bw_avg_bytes_per_us_default;
> > >
> > > s64 mem_highs_default[TTM_PL_PRIV+1];
> > > +
> > > + struct work_struct *mem_reclaim_wq[TTM_PL_PRIV];
> > > };
> > >
> > > #define DRMCG_CTF_PRIV_SIZE 3
> > > @@ -793,6 +795,31 @@ int drmcgrp_unregister_device(struct drm_device *dev)
> > > }
> > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(drmcgrp_unregister_device);
> > >
> > > +void drmcgrp_register_device_mm(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned type,
> > > + struct work_struct *wq)
> > > +{
> > > + if (dev == NULL || dev->primary->index > max_minor
> > > + || type >= TTM_PL_PRIV)
> > > + return;
> > > +
> > > + mutex_lock(&drmcgrp_mutex);
> > > + known_drmcgrp_devs[dev->primary->index]->mem_reclaim_wq[type] = wq;
> > > + mutex_unlock(&drmcgrp_mutex);
> > > +}
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drmcgrp_register_device_mm);
> > > +
> > > +void drmcgrp_unregister_device_mm(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned type)
> > > +{
> > > + if (dev == NULL || dev->primary->index > max_minor
> > > + || type >= TTM_PL_PRIV)
> > > + return;
> > > +
> > > + mutex_lock(&drmcgrp_mutex);
> > > + known_drmcgrp_devs[dev->primary->index]->mem_reclaim_wq[type] = NULL;
> > > + mutex_unlock(&drmcgrp_mutex);
> > > +}
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drmcgrp_unregister_device_mm);
> > > +
> > > bool drmcgrp_is_self_or_ancestor(struct drmcgrp *self, struct drmcgrp *relative)
> > > {
> > > for (; self != NULL; self = parent_drmcgrp(self))
> > > @@ -1004,6 +1031,12 @@ void drmcgrp_mem_track_move(struct ttm_buffer_object *old_bo, bool evict,
> > >
> > > ddr->mem_bw_stats[DRMCGRP_MEM_BW_ATTR_BYTE_CREDIT]
> > > -= move_in_bytes;
> > > +
> > > + if (known_dev->mem_reclaim_wq[new_mem_type] != NULL &&
> > > + ddr->mem_stats[new_mem_type] >
> > > + ddr->mem_highs[new_mem_type])
> > > + schedule_work(
> > > + known_dev->mem_reclaim_wq[new_mem_type]);
> > > }
> > > mutex_unlock(&known_dev->mutex);
> > > }
> > > --
> > > 2.21.0
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > dri-devel mailing list
> > > dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
> >
> > --
> > Daniel Vetter
> > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> > http://blog.ffwll.ch
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
