Re: [PATCH v3 hmm 06/12] mm/hmm: Hold on to the mmget for the lifetime of the range

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 08:34:52AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> /**
>  * list_empty_careful - tests whether a list is empty and not being modified
>  * @head: the list to test
>  *
>  * Description:
>  * tests whether a list is empty _and_ checks that no other CPU might be
>  * in the process of modifying either member (next or prev)
>  *
>  * NOTE: using list_empty_careful() without synchronization
>  * can only be safe if the only activity that can happen
>  * to the list entry is list_del_init(). Eg. it cannot be used
>  * if another CPU could re-list_add() it.
>  */
> 
> Agree it doesn't seem obvious why this is relevant when checking the
> list head..
> 
> Maybe the comment is a bit misleading?

>From looking at the commit log in the history tree list_empty_careful
was initially added by Linus, and then mingo added that comment later.
I don't see how list_del_init would change anything here, so I suspect
list_del_init was just used as a short hand for list_del or
list_del_init.
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux